Citation network
United States Vs. Edmondston
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1901
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 500 (1901) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. EdmondstonSearch
-
U.S. 500 (1901) United States v. EdmondstonSearch
-
Medbury v. UnitedSearch
-
official of the government was called upon to return moneys he had received by virtue of his office. Swift Company v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 181 U. S. 508 United States v. LeeSearch
-
held, under those circumstances, that no further tender was necessary, quoting the general rule laid down in Hills v. ExchangeSearch
-
all upon the question whether there be any right of recovery in case of a voluntary payment. Bank of United States v. BankSearch
-
to this third party created no cause of action against the party so receiving. On the other hand, in Lamborn v. DickinsonSearch
-
of law. Many cases are cited in the opinion sustaining that proposition. To the same effect is Railroad Company v. CommissionersSearch
-
The other class of cases is illustrated by United States v.Lawson, 101 U. S. 164 , and United States v. EllsworthSearch
-
On the other hand, in United States v. WilsonSearch
-
Yet confessedly, in all customs cases, protest is necessary -- made so by express statute. Counsel refer to Elliott v. SwartwoutSearch
-
But Elliott v. SwartwoutSearch
-
the Secretary of the Interior misconstrued the law of June 16, 1880, as seems probable from our decision in Medbury v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
that which seems to us most natural to develop the questions involved herein. As indicated in the opinion in Swift Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. EdmondstonSearch
-
Swift Company v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. LeeSearch
-
Hills v. ExchangeSearch
-
Bank of United States v. BankSearch
-
Lamborn v. DickinsonSearch
-
and United States v. EllsworthSearch
-
United States v. WilsonSearch
-
Swift Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Railroad Company v. CommissionersSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial