Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Patton Vs. Texas and Pacific Ry. Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 07, 1901

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 6 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. Griggs Vs. Houston US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1881
  2. Anderson County Commissioners Vs. Beal US Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1885
  3. Railroad Company Vs. Pollard US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1874
  4. Phoenix Ins. Co. Vs. Doster US Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1882
  5. Aerkfetz Vs. Humphreys US Supreme Court · May 16, 1892
  6. Stokes Vs. Saltonstall US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1839
  7. Patton v. Texas
    Search
  8. Pacific Ry. Co. - 179 U.S. 658 (1901) U.S. Supreme Court Patton v. Texas
    Search
  9. Pacific Ry. Co., 179 U.S. 658 (1901) Patton v. Texas
    Search
  10. in respect to place, was accurately stated by Mr. Justice Lamar for this Court in Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. McDade
    Search
  11. would be compelled to set aside a verdict returned in opposition Page 179 U. S. 660 to it. Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Doster
    Search
  12. Randall v. Baltimore
    Search
  13. Schofield v. Chicago
    Search
  14. Railroad v. Converse
    Search
  15. Aerkfetz v. Humphreys
    Search
  16. Elliott v. Chicago
    Search
  17. is so far a question of fact as to be properly submitted to and determined by them. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Powers
    Search
  18. to sustain a verdict against him, for there is prima facie a breach of his contract to carry safely, Stokes v. Saltonstall
    Search
  19. Gleeson v. Virginia
    Search
  20. fact for the injured employee to establish that the employer has been guilty of negligence. Texas & Pacific Railway v. Barrett
    Search
  21. it is also true that there is no guaranty by the employer that place and machinery shall be absolutely safe. Hough v. Railway
    Search
  22. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Baugh
    Search
  23. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Mackey
    Search
  24. Texas & Pacific Railway v. Archibald
    Search
  25. respect to place, was thus accurately stated by Mr. Justice Lamar for this Court in Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. McDade
    Search
  26. U.S. Supreme Court Patton v. Texas
    Search
  27. Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. McDade
    Search
  28. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Powers
    Search
  29. Texas & Pacific Railway v. Barrett
    Search
  30. Hough v. Railway
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial