Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Mitchell Vs. Furman

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 11, 1901

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 4 linked 27 unlinked
Show
  1. Botiller Vs. Dominguez US Supreme Court · Apr 01, 1889
  2. United States Vs. Percheman US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1832
  3. Frost Vs. Spitley US Supreme Court · May 02, 1887
  4. United States Vs. Peralta US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1856
  5. U.S. 402 (1901) U.S. Supreme Court Mitchell v. Furman
    Search
  6. U.S. 402 (1901) Mitchell v. Furman
    Search
  7. circuit court and to justify an appeal from its decree directly to this Court. The record differs from that in Muse v. Arlington
    Search
  8. connected with possession. The general rule is that complainants in such suits must be in actual possession. Frost v. Spitley
    Search
  9. it is enough if the land be wild and unoccupied, or if some independent head of equity jurisdiction exists. Richards v. Morris
    Search
  10. Hughes v. Hannah
    Search
  11. Sloan v. Sloan
    Search
  12. to have had the power to make a royal grant, nor was any ratification of what he did do shown. In United States v. Arredondo
    Search
  13. Pet. 691, and in United States v. Peralta
    Search
  14. Hayes v. United
    Search
  15. In Crespin v. United
    Search
  16. U. S. 208 , which was a case under the act of 1891, it was held that the presumption indulged in United States v. Arredondo
    Search
  17. genuineness and their extent established by proceedings in a particular manner before they could be held valid. Ainsa v. New
    Search
  18. Glenn v. United
    Search
  19. States, 13 How. 250. In United States v. Clarke
    Search
  20. In Glenn v. United
    Search
  21. The cases of United States v. Arredondo
    Search
  22. Pet. 436, were all instances of complete and perfect titles brought into court under these statutes. Botiller v. Dominguez
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Mitchell v. Furman
    Search
  24. Muse v. Arlington
    Search
  25. Richards v. Morris
    Search
  26. In United States v. Arredondo
    Search
  27. Ainsa v. New
    Search
  28. In United States v. Clarke
    Search
  29. of United States v. Arredondo
    Search
  30. United States v. Clarke
    Search
  31. United States v. Arredondo
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial