Citation network
Wilkes County Vs. Coler
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 18, 1901
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 506 (1901) U.S. Supreme Court Wilkes County v. ColerSearch
-
U.S. 506 (1901) Wilkes County v. ColerSearch
-
Wilkes County v. CallSearch
-
Bank v. CommissionersSearch
-
Commissioners v. SnuggsSearch
-
Rodman v. WashingtonSearch
-
Commissioners v. PayneSearch
-
entered on the legislative journals, let us inquire as to the scope of the decisions in the above cases. In Bank v. CommissionersSearch
-
entry on the journals essential to the validity of the act. These principles were again announced in Commissioners v. SnuggsSearch
-
that fact. That provision of the Constitution (section 14 of Article 2) is mandatory, as we have decided in Bank v. CommissionersSearch
-
These two decisions were followed in Rodman v. WashingtonSearch
-
N.C. 39, 41 (1898), and Commissioners v. PayneSearch
-
N.C. 432, 487 (1898). The same question arose in Wilkes County v. CallSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
To the above cases we may add that of State v. PattersonSearch
-
Page 180 U. S. 517 After the decision in State v. PattersonSearch
-
readings of a bill. The North Carolina cases cited by the defendants in support of this proposition are Brodnax v. GroomSearch
-
Gatlin v. TarboroSearch
-
N.C. 119 (1878), and Scarborough v. RobinsonSearch
-
N.C. 409 (1879). Let us see what was involved in those cases. In Brodnax v. GroomSearch
-
In Gatlin v. TarboroSearch
-
best and only proof is by the record. Our opinion on this point is supported by a recent decision in Illinois. Happel v. BrethauerSearch
-
In Scarborough v. RobinsonSearch
-
the state constitution. Those cases arose under other provisions of the constitution. It is true that in Scarborough v. RobinsonSearch
-
Court in cases heretofore decided that a discussion of them upon principle is unnecessary. In Town of South Ottawa v. PerkinsSearch
-
judicial one, and must be so regarded by the courts of the United States. These principles were reaffirmed in Post v. SupervisorsSearch
-
Amoskeag Bank v. OttawaSearch
-
cases referred to in the certified questions without departing from the principles announced by this Court in Field v. ClarkSearch
-
have rested their decisions in the cases referred to in the first of the certified questions. The case of Field v. ClarkSearch
-
So that, in Field v. ClarkSearch
-
that, even if the decisions in North Carolina rested upon grounds inconsistent with the principles announced in Field v. ClarkSearch
-
to issue them, although such authority was not recited in the bonds. This contention rests mainly upon Anderson County v. BealSearch
-
To the same effect is Knox County v. NinthSearch
-
question whether the circuit court should have followed the decisions of the Supreme Court of North Carolina in Bank v. CommissionersSearch
-
Commissioners of Wilkes County v. CallSearch
-
and Commissioners v. PayneSearch
-
and that it had been in effect so decided by the supreme court of the state before the bonds were issued in Hill v. CommissionersSearch
-
N.C. 367 (1870), and Belo v. CommissionersSearch
-
N.C. 489 (1877). In Hill v. CommissionersSearch
-
question whether Wilkes County had power, under that ordinance alone, to issue the bonds here involved. In Belo v. CommissionersSearch
-
a question not now decided. In this connection, we must allude to what was said in Commissioners of Wilkes County v. CallSearch
-
We have not overlooked the fact that, in Belo v. CommissionersSearch
-
This view was again expressed in Commissioners v. PayneSearch
-
unexecuted provision of the ordinance of 1868 inconsistent with the state constitution could be executed. Aspinwall v. CommissionersSearch
-
Norton v. BrownsvilleSearch
-
Loeb v. TrusteesSearch
-
circuit court of the United States should have regarded the decisions of the Supreme Court of North Carolina in Bank v. CommissionersSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Wilkes County v. ColerSearch
-
In Bank v. CommissionersSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial