Citation network
Whitney Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 15, 1901
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Whitney v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 181 U.S. 104 (1901) U.S. Supreme Court Whitney v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 181 U.S. 104 (1901) Whitney v. UnitedSearch
-
had acquired all that the law of 1824 permitted him to take, and the subsequent grant was not valid. United States v. HartnellSearch
-
to establish a Mexican grant if there is nothing in the public records to show that it ever existed. Peralta v. UnitedSearch
-
in that, any record of further proceedings to obtain the approval of the supreme government. In United States v. TeschmakerSearch
-
In Berreyesa v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. OrtizSearch
-
admitted in this particular case. That it is not a sufficient excuse has been decided by this Court. United States v. CastroSearch
-
law and the regulations above mentioned were all that were in force in Mexico after their dates. United States v. CambustonSearch
-
was urged by way of argument by counsel, and referred to by Mr. Justice Lamar in his opinion in Interstate Land Co. v. MaxwellSearch
-
Land Grant Co., 139 U. S. 569 , 139 U. S. 578 . Again, in United States v. CoeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Florida cases, herein referred to. We think no such presumption ought to obtain in this case. In United States v. CambustonSearch
-
between the cases involving Spanish titles in the Territories of Louisiana and Florida, such as United States v. ArredondoSearch
-
Delassus v. UnitedSearch
-
examined by the Court of Private Land Claims and by this Court is clearly recognized and enforced in United States v. OrtizSearch
-
must prove his title by a preponderance of evidence, and no presumption of authority existed. And in Hayes v. UnitedSearch
-
the supreme executive for making such a grant. If that were shown, we might say, following the case of United States v. CastilleroSearch
-
the grant was a valid one, and ought to have been confirmed by the court below, and within the case of United States v. OsioSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Whitney v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. HartnellSearch
-
Peralta v. UnitedSearch
-
In United States v. TeschmakerSearch
-
Court. United States v. CastroSearch
-
Interstate Land Co. v. MaxwellSearch
-
In United States v. CambustonSearch
-
Hayes v. UnitedSearch
-
of United States v. CastilleroSearch
-
of United States v. OsioSearch
-
United States v. VallejoSearch
-
United States v. VigilSearch
-
United States v. OrtizSearch
-
United States v. CoeSearch
-
United States v. ArredondoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial