Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

The Barnstable

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 13, 1901

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 2 linked 30 unlinked
Show
  1. Sturm Vs. Boker US Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1893
  2. Thorp Vs. Hammond US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1870
  3. So, in United States v. The
    Search
  4. to return the steamer to her owners free from any lien of their own contracting, or caused by their own fault. Thorp v. Hammond
    Search
  5. Williams v. Hays
    Search
  6. Scott v. Scott
    Search
  7. Webster v. Dishroon
    Search
  8. Gulzoni v. Tyler
    Search
  9. and such injuries Page 181 U. S. 469 as are caused by a peril of the sea, or inevitable accident. Coupe Co. v. Maddick
    Search
  10. have covered damages done to another vessel, though the rule in this Court is, following the English case of De Vaux v. Salvador
    Search
  11. policy against perils of the sea does not cover damage done to another vessel by collision. General Mutual Ins Co. v. Sherwood
    Search
  12. This case was decided in 1853, although shortly before that, the Supreme Court of Massachusetts had held in Nelson v. Suffolk
    Search
  13. which the vessel insured might do to another vessel. The same view had already been taken by Mr. Justice Story in Hale v. Washington
    Search
  14. of a policy of insurance is one of general, rather than one of local, law ( Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix
    Search
  15. Gloucester Ins. Co. v. Younger
    Search
  16. to be a difference in practice, some charters providing that the insurance shall be paid by the charterer, Latson v. Sturm
    Search
  17. and thereby to explain, control, and qualify the language of the charter. This was obviously impossible. Seitz v. Brewers'
    Search
  18. only bound by the obligations imported by the words of the insurance clause in their ordinary commercial sense. Page v. Cagwin
    Search
  19. Bristol v. Dann
    Search
  20. Clews v. Kehr
    Search
  21. Truax v. Slater
    Search
  22. Tabor v. Van
    Search
  23. United States v. The
    Search
  24. Coupe Co. v. Maddick
    Search
  25. of De Vaux v. Salvador
    Search
  26. General Mutual Ins Co. v. Sherwood
    Search
  27. Nelson v. Suffolk
    Search
  28. Hale v. Washington
    Search
  29. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix
    Search
  30. Latson v. Sturm
    Search
  31. Seitz v. Brewers'
    Search
  32. Page v. Cagwin
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial