Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Clews Vs. Jamieson

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 27, 1901

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

43 entries 4 linked 39 unlinked
Show
  1. Law Vs. Cross US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1861
  2. Cook Vs. Tullis US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1873
  3. irwIn Vs. Williar US Supreme Court · Mar 03, 1884
    Relied / Followed
  4. Pearce Vs. Rice US Supreme Court · Dec 07, 1891
  5. U.S. 461 (1901) U.S. Supreme Court Clews v. Jamieson
    Search
  6. U.S. 461 (1901) Clews v. Jamieson
    Search
  7. situated that the jurisdiction of equity, though not exclusive, is acknowledged. 1 Pom.Eq.Jur. sec. 157. In Foley v. Hill
    Search
  8. and therefore equity has jurisdiction. In Marvin v. Brooks
    Search
  9. a , that in general a trustee is suable in equity in regard to any matters touching the trust. In Oelrichs v. Spain
    Search
  10. thereby confers upon the broker authority to deal according to any well settled usage in such trade or market, Bibb v. Allen
    Search
  11. Lucena v. Craufurd
    Search
  12. Routh v. Thompson
    Search
  13. Hagedorn v. Oliverson
    Search
  14. Fleckner v. United
    Search
  15. Black 533, 66 U. S. 539 , citing Hoyt v. Thompson
    Search
  16. This quotation with the doctrine therein stated is approved in Irwin v. Williar
    Search
  17. delivery otherwise than by purchasing them after the contract is made does not invalidate the contract. Hibblewhite v. McMorine
    Search
  18. of the article, there shall be a mere payment of the difference between the contract and the market price. Pearce v. Rice
    Search
  19. Pickering v. Cease
    Search
  20. And in Pearce v. Rice
    Search
  21. delivery, in the future, of grain or other commodities -- which contracts would not have been illegal ( Pickering v. Cease
    Search
  22. the party making the assertion. A defense of the illegality of the contract was pleaded by the defendant in Cothran v. Ellis
    Search
  23. In Irwin v. Williar
    Search
  24. words, a mere wagering contract. This charge was approved by this Court, and the principle was again approved in Bibb v. Allen
    Search
  25. to another and a future day. To uphold the rulings of the circuit court of appeals herein, the cases of Pickering v. Cease
    Search
  26. Lyon v. Culbertson
    Search
  27. Tenney v. Foote
    Search
  28. Pearce v. Foote
    Search
  29. Cothran v. Ellis
    Search
  30. Schneider v. Turner
    Search
  31. Soby v. People
    Search
  32. bought or sold, is guilty of an offense under the Illinois act of 1887. 134 Ill., supra. The cases of Pearce v. Rice
    Search
  33. U. S. 28 , and Irwin v. Williar
    Search
  34. U.S. Supreme Court Clews v. Jamieson
    Search
  35. In Foley v. Hill
    Search
  36. In Marvin v. Brooks
    Search
  37. In Oelrichs v. Spain
    Search
  38. Bibb v. Allen
    Search
  39. Hoyt v. Thompson
    Search
  40. Hibblewhite v. McMorine
    Search
  41. of Pickering v. Cease
    Search
  42. of Pearce v. Rice
    Search
  43. and Irwin v. Williar
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial