Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Dooley Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 02, 1901

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

67 entries 3 linked 64 unlinked
Show
  1. Downes Vs. Bidwell US Supreme Court · May 27, 1901
  2. Woodruff Vs. Parham US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1868
  3. United States Vs. Howell US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1870
  4. Dooley v. United
    Search
  5. States - 183 U.S. 151 (1901) U.S. Supreme Court Dooley v. United
    Search
  6. States, 183 U.S. 151 (1901) Dooley v. United
    Search
  7. to a foreign country, and has no application to Porto Rico, which, in the case of De Lima Page 183 U. S. 152 v. Bidwell
    Search
  8. to the complaint for insufficiency was sustained, and the petition dismissed. The case was argued with De Lima v. Bidwell
    Search
  9. and Armstrong v. United
    Search
  10. was held in Woodruff v. Parham
    Search
  11. Defendants relied largely upon a dictum in Brown v. Maryland
    Search
  12. was afterwards approved in Brown v. Houston
    Search
  13. U. S. 623 . See also Fairbank v. United
    Search
  14. States, 181 U. S. 283 . It follows, and is the logical sequence of the case of Woodruff v. Parham
    Search
  15. should be given a correlative meaning, and applied only to goods exported to a foreign country. Muller v. Baldwin
    Search
  16. Porto Rico be no longer a foreign country under the Dingley Act, as was held by a majority of this Court in De Lima v. Bidwell
    Search
  17. U. S. 1 , and Dooley v. United
    Search
  18. significance. The manner in which and the place at which the tax is levied are of minor consequence. Thus, in Brown v. Maryland
    Search
  19. without the consent of Congress, lay any impost or duty on imports or exports, and in the recent case of Fairbank v. United
    Search
  20. the limits of that port. From this moment, the duties became payable as upon imported merchandise. United States v. Howell
    Search
  21. Arnold v. United
    Search
  22. Meredith v. United
    Search
  23. a separate fund for the government and benefit of Porto Rico. The action is really correlative to that of Downes v. Bidwell
    Search
  24. the opinion embodies as it is by me understood. In my judgment, the opinion of the court in the cases of De Lima v. Bidwell
    Search
  25. in the case of The Diamond Rings, as well as the opinions of the majority of the members of the Court in Downes v. Bidwell
    Search
  26. if it is not, affirmance is required. In Woodruff v. Parham
    Search
  27. In the course of the opinion, an intimation of Mr. Chief Justice Marshall, in Brown v. Maryland
    Search
  28. in the cause, and not therefore decided. So also, the attention of the Court was directed to the case of Almy v. California
    Search
  29. exports, and hence was void, because an export tax within the meaning of the Constitution. In the opinion in Woodruff v. Parham
    Search
  30. it was expressly decided that, although the conclusion in Almy v. California
    Search
  31. the movement of goods between the states, and not exclusively to foreign commerce. To the extent, therefore, that Almy v. California
    Search
  32. the meaning of the Constitution embraced anything but foreign commerce, it was expressly overruled. In Brown v. Houston
    Search
  33. U. S. 622 , decided in 1884, fourteen years after the decision in Woodruff v. Parham
    Search
  34. It was decided by this Court in the case of Woodruff v. Parham
    Search
  35. Page 183 U. S. 161 The opinion, after stating the facts which were presented in Woodruff v. Parham
    Search
  36. as having been conclusively determined by Woodruff v. Parham
    Search
  37. a foreign country, or had been, as it was claimed, in part actually exported to such country. Again, in Fairbank v. United
    Search
  38. country was a tax on exports. In the course of the opinion, in considering the question, the Court referred to Almy v. California
    Search
  39. It is true that, thereafter, in Woodruff v. Parham
    Search
  40. A consideration of the opinions in Woodruff v. Parham
    Search
  41. and Page 183 U. S. 162 Brown v. Houston
    Search
  42. so recently in effect approved by this Court in the case of Fairbank v. United
    Search
  43. of the United States. And, by implication, in a number of cases decided by this Court since the decision in Woodruff v. Parham
    Search
  44. on the states to impose any direct, but also any indirect, burden, and therefore, under the doctrine of Brown v. Maryland
    Search
  45. foreign commerce and co-related with the clause as to exports, it would follow, as was clearly pointed out in Woodruff v. Parham
    Search
  46. is, then, the issue. In De Lima v. Bidwell
    Search
  47. U. S. 164 under its sovereignty and subject, as a possession, to the legislative power of Congress. In Downes v. Bidwell
    Search
  48. This contention, however, is but a restatement of the proposition which the Court held to be unsound in Downes v. Bidwell
    Search
  49. the contention is unfounded, and really but amounts to an indirect attack upon the doctrines announced in Woodruff v. Parham
    Search
  50. U.S. Supreme Court Dooley v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial