Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Wilson Vs. Nelson

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 09, 1901

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

45 entries 4 linked 41 unlinked
Show
  1. Bryan Vs. Bernheimer US Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1901
  2. Wall Vs. Cox US Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1901
  3. Clark Vs. Iselin US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1874
  4. National Bank Vs. Warren US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1877
  5. U.S. 191 (1901) U.S. Supreme Court Wilson v. Nelson
    Search
  6. U.S. 191 (1901) Wilson v. Nelson
    Search
  7. has already had occasion to observe, differ in important respects from those of the earlier Bankrupt Acts. Bardes v. Hawarden
    Search
  8. Pirie v. Chicago
    Search
  9. and consented to the preference that he failed to vacate. The cases on which the appellee relies, of Wilson v. City
    Search
  10. Wall. 360, and National Bank v. Warren
    Search
  11. which expressly required the debtor to have acted with intent to give a preference. The case of Buckingham v. McLean
    Search
  12. and delivered under the law of the State of Wisconsin, a legal and usual form of security for money loaned. McCaul v. Thayer
    Search
  13. Second Ward Savings Bank v. Schranck
    Search
  14. if we respect previous decisions of this Court in similar cases. The subject was considered in Buckingham v. McLean
    Search
  15. some states, they operate only as a lien on the lands of the debtor, in others, on his personal estate also ( Brown v. Clarke
    Search
  16. have been conflicting decisions. It has been held that contemplation of a state of insolvency was sufficient. Pulling v. Tucker
    Search
  17. Poland v. Glyn
    Search
  18. But both the earlier and later decisions were otherwise, and, in our judgment, they contain the sounder rule. Fidgeon v. Sharpe
    Search
  19. Hartshorn v. Slodden
    Search
  20. Gibbins v. Phillipps
    Search
  21. Belcher v. Prittie
    Search
  22. Morgan v. Brundrett
    Search
  23. insolvency. But, as we shall presently see, such provisions do not affect the question before us now. In Wilson v. City
    Search
  24. The principles of this case were approved and applied in Clark v. Iselin
    Search
  25. before us, similar to those of the present. In the opinion Mr. Justice Strong, after citing with approval Wilson v. City
    Search
  26. if made, must rest on a mere fiction. And so it has been decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Sleek v. Turner's
    Search
  27. Similar views prevailed in National Bank v. Warren
    Search
  28. it is undeniable that, under the provisions of the Bankrupt Act of 1867, and within the principles laid in Buckingham v. McLean
    Search
  29. Wilson v. City
    Search
  30. Bank, Clark v. Iselin
    Search
  31. and National Bank v. Warren
    Search
  32. Duncan v. Landis
    Search
  33. F. 839. The case of Pirie v. Chicago
    Search
  34. U.S. Supreme Court Wilson v. Nelson
    Search
  35. Bankrupt Acts. Bardes v. Hawarden
    Search
  36. of Wilson v. City
    Search
  37. of Buckingham v. McLean
    Search
  38. McCaul v. Thayer
    Search
  39. Brown v. Clarke
    Search
  40. Pulling v. Tucker
    Search
  41. Fidgeon v. Sharpe
    Search
  42. In Wilson v. City
    Search
  43. the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Sleek v. Turner's
    Search
  44. of Pirie v. Chicago
    Search
  45. Buckingham v. McLean
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial