Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Louisiana Vs. Texas

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 15, 1900

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 2 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Hennington Vs. Georgia US Supreme Court · May 18, 1896
  2. New Hampshire Vs. Louisiana US Supreme Court · Mar 06, 1883
  3. U.S. 1 (1900) U.S. Supreme Court Louisiana v. Texas
    Search
  4. U.S. 1 (1900) Louisiana v. Texas
    Search
  5. absolute and the matter, in itself, properly justiciable. Undoubtedly, as remarked by Mr. Justice Bradley in Hans v. Louisiana
    Search
  6. public law, are not subjects of judicial cognizance, this Court has often declined to take jurisdiction. See Wisconsin v. Pelican
    Search
  7. of the parties, and is confined to the cases in which are those enumerated parties, and those only. California v. Southern
    Search
  8. United States v. Texas
    Search
  9. Referring to this amendment, Mr. Chief Justice Waite, in New Hampshire v. Louisiana
    Search
  10. and New York v. Louisiana
    Search
  11. with the consent of Congress, they may be composed by agreement. As pointed out by Mr. Justice Field in Virginia v. Tennessee
    Search
  12. They are cited in Wisconsin v. Pelican
    Search
  13. Ins. Co., 127 U. S. 265 , and are chiefly controversies as to boundaries. In South Carolina v. Georgia
    Search
  14. So, in Wisconsin v. Duluth
    Search
  15. was not passed upon. Page 176 U. S. 19 In Pennsylvania v. Wheeling
    Search
  16. by the laws of the United States almost from the beginning of the government. In Morgan Steamship Company v. Louisiana
    Search
  17. that the courts must guard vigilantly against needless intrusion upon the field committed to Congress. Railroad Co. v. Husen
    Search
  18. Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway v. Haber
    Search
  19. to appear as defendants in an action brought in this Court. If this be not so, we were wrong in New Hampshire v. Louisiana
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court Louisiana v. Texas
    Search
  21. Hans v. Louisiana
    Search
  22. See Wisconsin v. Pelican
    Search
  23. California v. Southern
    Search
  24. Virginia v. Tennessee
    Search
  25. Wisconsin v. Pelican
    Search
  26. In South Carolina v. Georgia
    Search
  27. Wisconsin v. Duluth
    Search
  28. In Pennsylvania v. Wheeling
    Search
  29. In Morgan Steamship Company v. Louisiana
    Search
  30. Congress. Railroad Co. v. Husen
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial