Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Matteson Vs. Dent

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 26, 1900

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

38 entries 8 linked 30 unlinked
Show
  1. Flash Vs. Conn US Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1883
  2. Richmond Vs. Irons US Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1887
  3. Sanger Vs. Upton US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1875
  4. Webster Vs. Upton US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1875
  5. Pullman Vs. Upton US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1877
  6. Bowden Vs. Johnson US Supreme Court · Mar 05, 1883
  7. Upton Vs. Tribilcock US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1875
  8. Whitney Vs. Butler US Supreme Court · Nov 01, 1886
  9. U.S. 521 (1900) U.S. Supreme Court Matteson v. Dent
    Search
  10. U.S. 521 (1900) Matteson v. Dent
    Search
  11. the estate of the stockholder. The principle controlling the subject was quite clearly stated by Shipman, J., in Davis v. Weed
    Search
  12. The question was settled in Richmond v. Irons
    Search
  13. We hold, therefore, that the obligation of the stockholder survives as against his personal representatives. Flash v. Conn
    Search
  14. Hobart v. Johnson
    Search
  15. Blatchford 359. In Massachusetts, it was held, in Grew v. Breed
    Search
  16. to examine. The accepted doctrine finds nowhere a more lucid statement than in the courts of New York. Thus, in Bailey v. Hollister
    Search
  17. that the parties to a contract intend to bind not only themselves, but their personal representatives. Kernochan v. Murray
    Search
  18. N.Y. 306. The doctrine enunciated in Bailey v. Hollister
    Search
  19. as above stated was later applied in Cochran v. Wiechers
    Search
  20. under the statute is so well established, upon principle and authority, that further discussion is unnecessary. Chase v. Lord
    Search
  21. accompanied by a transfer on the books of registry of the association, such registered owner remains liable. Upton v. Tribilcock
    Search
  22. Anderson v. Philadelphia
    Search
  23. Warehouse Co., 111 U. S. 479 , and Richmond v. Irons
    Search
  24. rule established by state courts in construing statutes containing substantially similar provisions. In Shellington v. Howland
    Search
  25. to pay assessments, such transfer will be disregarded and the real owner be held liable. Germania National Bank v. Case
    Search
  26. to will operate a transfer on the books and extinguish the liability as stockholder of the transferor. Whitney v. Butler
    Search
  27. to the pledgee as owner, and that he therefore was not liable, although the pledgeor might continue to be so. Pauly v. State
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court Matteson v. Dent
    Search
  29. Davis v. Weed
    Search
  30. Grew v. Breed
    Search
  31. Bailey v. Hollister
    Search
  32. Kernochan v. Murray
    Search
  33. Cochran v. Wiechers
    Search
  34. Chase v. Lord
    Search
  35. and Richmond v. Irons
    Search
  36. In Shellington v. Howland
    Search
  37. Germania National Bank v. Case
    Search
  38. Pauly v. State
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial