Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Ortiz

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 26, 1900

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 5 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Bolton US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1859
  2. United States Vs. Neleigh US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1861
  3. United States Vs. Castro US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1860
  4. United States Vs. Cambuston US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1857
  5. United States Vs. Teschmaker US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1859
  6. U.S. 422 (1900) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Ortiz
    Search
  7. U.S. 422 (1900) United States v. Ortiz
    Search
  8. not as explicitly mandatory as are those of the act of 1891. Thus, from the date of the decision in United States v. Cambuston
    Search
  9. How. 64, announced in 1857, to the ruling in Berreyesa v. United
    Search
  10. the grant, calling for the production by the grantee of more than slight evidence to overthrow the presumption. Luco v. United
    Search
  11. Peralta v. United
    Search
  12. of avoiding the danger of imposing upon the United States by means of forged or fabricated grants. United States v. Teschmaker
    Search
  13. Fuentes v. United
    Search
  14. Luco v. United
    Search
  15. Palmer v. United
    Search
  16. White v. United
    Search
  17. Romero v. United
    Search
  18. Pico v. United
    Search
  19. Peralto v. United
    Search
  20. of the signatures found upon the alleged grant. The case is directly within the principle decided in Rogers v. Ritter
    Search
  21. the enlarged photographs were tendered, and were admitted in evidence over objection. The ruling was correct. Marcy v. Barnes
    Search
  22. or of a testimonio of title, upon which questions we refrain from expressing any opinion whatever. Luco v. United
    Search
  23. Van Reynegan v. Page
    Search
  24. the testimony of Ramon Sena alone), and therefore bring the case directly under the rule laid down in United States v. Cambuston
    Search
  25. Black 227, and Peralta v. United
    Search
  26. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Ortiz
    Search
  27. Berreyesa v. United
    Search
  28. Rogers v. Ritter
    Search
  29. Marcy v. Barnes
    Search
  30. and Peralta v. United
    Search
  31. United States v. Pico
    Search
  32. United States v. Knight
    Search
  33. United States v. Vallejo
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial