Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Knights of Pythias Vs. Withers

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 09, 1900

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

44 entries 44 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 260 (1900) U.S. Supreme Court Knights of Pythias v. Withers
    Search
  2. U.S. 260 (1900) Knights of Pythias v. Withers
    Search
  3. the application, with respect to the statements therein contained. It was formerly held in New York Rohrbach v. Germania
    Search
  4. Fire Ins. Co., 62 N.Y. 47, and Alexander v. Germania
    Search
  5. but in a subsequent case. Whited v. Germania
    Search
  6. So in Sprague v. Holland
    Search
  7. the former, and that there was no warranty binding upon the plaintiff. In Patridge v. Commercial
    Search
  8. In Nassauer v. Susquehanna
    Search
  9. This Court, in the case above cited, Columbia Ins. Co. v. Cooper
    Search
  10. Similar cases are those of Eilenberger v. Ins
    Search
  11. Ins. Co. v. Cusick
    Search
  12. Pa. 157, and Kister v. Lebanon
    Search
  13. Ins. Co. v. Ward
    Search
  14. the broker obtaining an insurance is the agent of the insured is not conclusive upon that subject. Indiana Ins. Co. v. Hartwell
    Search
  15. Ins. Co. v. Crutchfield
    Search
  16. agent, upon whose counter signature the validity of the policy, by its terms, was made to depend. In Boetcher v. Hawkeye
    Search
  17. the latter, of which the company could not take advantage. Speaking of the agency clause in Continental Ins. Co. v. Pearce
    Search
  18. Kausal v. Minnesota
    Search
  19. and not to the insured, notwithstanding the insertion of an agency clause in the policy. In Planters' Ins. Co. v. Myers
    Search
  20. The case of Schunck v. Gegenseitiger
    Search
  21. in paying over such dues to the defendant. The agency clause was also once before this Court in the case of Grace v. American
    Search
  22. Whiteside v. Supreme
    Search
  23. Knights of Pythias v. Bridges
    Search
  24. the tenth of the month. We have not overlooked in this connection the case of Campbell Page 177 U. S. 276 v. Knights
    Search
  25. so different that the case cannot be considered an authority upon the propositions here discussed. The cases of Peet v. Knights
    Search
  26. of Maccabees, 83 Mich. 92, and McClure v. Supreme
    Search
  27. U.S. Supreme Court Knights of Pythias v. Withers
    Search
  28. New York Rohrbach v. Germania
    Search
  29. and Alexander v. Germania
    Search
  30. Whited v. Germania
    Search
  31. Sprague v. Holland
    Search
  32. In Patridge v. Commercial
    Search
  33. Columbia Ins. Co. v. Cooper
    Search
  34. of Eilenberger v. Ins
    Search
  35. and Kister v. Lebanon
    Search
  36. Indiana Ins. Co. v. Hartwell
    Search
  37. In Boetcher v. Hawkeye
    Search
  38. Continental Ins. Co. v. Pearce
    Search
  39. Kausal v. Minnesota
    Search
  40. In Planters' Ins. Co. v. Myers
    Search
  41. of Schunck v. Gegenseitiger
    Search
  42. of Grace v. American
    Search
  43. of Peet v. Knights
    Search
  44. and McClure v. Supreme
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial