Citation network
Apache County Vs. Barth
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 30, 1900
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 538 (1900) U.S. Supreme Court Apache County v. BarthSearch
-
U.S. 538 (1900) Apache County v. BarthSearch
-
Court only when the decisions of the court were excepted to, and our jurisdiction is regulated by that act. Grayson v. LynchSearch
-
its judgment, and to a review of exceptions duly taken to rulings on admission or rejection of evidence. Grayson v. LynchSearch
-
v. Day, 19 Ind. 450, and Commissioners of Leavenworth County v. KellerSearch
-
citing Hamilton v. NewcastleSearch
-
U. S. 546 facts going to show that no cause of action existed rested upon the defendant to prove. In Grayson v. LathamSearch
-
Another case relied upon to sustain the ruling of the courts below is that of Wall v. MonroeSearch
-
county. Statutes similar to this have been passed in other states, and it has been held in Colorado, in Lothrop v. RobertsSearch
-
for the plaintiff to give proof of its execution before the note was properly admissible in evidence. In Horn v. VolcanoSearch
-
the genuineness and due execution of the note sued on were regarded as admitted. To the same effect is Corcoran v. DollSearch
-
complaint containing a copy, and the answer not verified, the due execution of the note was admitted. In Shepherd v. RoyceSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
sued on was to cast upon appellant the burden of proving the execution of the note as at common law, citing Wallace v. WallaceSearch
-
Ill.App. 69. The Michigan courts have decided in the same way upon the same kind of a statute. Ortmann v. Merchants'Search
-
New York Iron Mine v. Citizen'sSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Apache County v. BarthSearch
-
and Commissioners of Leavenworth County v. KellerSearch
-
Hamilton v. NewcastleSearch
-
In Grayson v. LathamSearch
-
of Wall v. MonroeSearch
-
Lothrop v. RobertsSearch
-
In Horn v. VolcanoSearch
-
Corcoran v. DollSearch
-
In Shepherd v. RoyceSearch
-
Wallace v. WallaceSearch
-
Ortmann v. Merchants'Search
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial