Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Smith Vs. Reeves

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 14, 1900

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

57 entries 8 linked 49 unlinked
Show
  1. Pennoyer Vs. Mcconnaughy US Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1891
  2. Holland Vs. Challen US Supreme Court · Jan 07, 1884
  3. Dick Vs. Foraker US Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1894
  4. Rich Vs. Braxton US Supreme Court · May 06, 1895
  5. Mcconihay Vs. Wright US Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1887
  6. Hagood Vs. Southern US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1886
  7. Tindal Vs. Wesley US Supreme Court · May 10, 1897
  8. Payne Vs. Hook US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1868
  9. U.S. 436 (1900) U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. Reeves
    Search
  10. U.S. 436 (1900) Smith v. Reeves
    Search
  11. or of the action. The demurrer was sustained with leave to amend, and the motion to dismiss was denied. Reinhart v. McDonald
    Search
  12. with leave to amend. No further amendment having been filed, the action was dismissed by the circuit court. Smith v. Rackliffe
    Search
  13. defendant asserts or suggests that the right of possession is in the state of which he is an officer or agent. Tindal v. Wesley
    Search
  14. been taken from them under an illegal assessment. The case, in some material aspects, is like that of Louisiana v. Junel
    Search
  15. respect of the matters specified in that section, and it is argued that this case comes within the decision in Beers v. Arkansas
    Search
  16. So, in Clark v. Barnard
    Search
  17. take nor surrender jurisdiction except pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the United States. In Beers v. Arkansas
    Search
  18. could not restrict its consent to be sued to actions brought in its own courts, counsel refer to Railway Company v. Whitton
    Search
  19. Reagan v. Farmers'
    Search
  20. Loan & Trust Co., 154 U. S. 362 , 154 U. S. 391 , and Smyth v. Ames
    Search
  21. U. S. 466 , 169 U. S. 516 . Railway Company v. Whitton
    Search
  22. Bardon v. Land
    Search
  23. jurisdiction attaches by reason of diverse citizenship or upon any other ground of federal jurisdiction. Payne v. Hook
    Search
  24. that the wise policy of the Constitution gives him a choice of tribunals. Davis v. Gray
    Search
  25. Cowley v. Northern
    Search
  26. In Smyth v. Ames
    Search
  27. the Court distinctly reaffirmed what was said upon this point in Reagan v. Farmers'
    Search
  28. contention rests upon the ground that the Eleventh Amendment -- which was passed because of the decision in Chisholm v. Georgia
    Search
  29. this suit having been brought by a federal corporation created for national purposes, Osborn v. Bank
    Search
  30. California v. Central
    Search
  31. Northern Pacific Railroad Co. v. Amato
    Search
  32. We cannot approve this interpretation. This question is controlled by the principles announced in Hans v. Louisiana
    Search
  33. In the opinion in that case, delivered by Mr. Justice Bradley, reference was made to the question involved in Chisholm v. Georgia
    Search
  34. or laws of the United States, is clearly established by the decisions of this Court in several recent cases. Louisiana v. Junel
    Search
  35. asserted. . . . 'It may be accepted as a point of departure unquestioned,' said Mr. Justice Miller, in Cunningham v. Macon
    Search
  36. Undoubtedly a state may be sued by its own consent, as was the case in Curran v. Arkansas
    Search
  37. How. 304, 56 U. S. 309 , and in Clark v. Barnard
    Search
  38. law which the legislature passed in conformity to the Constitution of that state. But this Court decided, in Beers v. Arkansas
    Search
  39. on public law. It is enough for us to declare its existence. The present plaintiffs, as did the plaintiffs in Hans v. Louisiana
    Search
  40. Constitution. We deem it unnecessary to repeat Page 178 U. S. 449 or enlarge upon the reasons given in Hans v. Louisiana
    Search
  41. U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. Reeves
    Search
  42. Reinhart v. McDonald
    Search
  43. Smith v. Rackliffe
    Search
  44. of Louisiana v. Junel
    Search
  45. Beers v. Arkansas
    Search
  46. Clark v. Barnard
    Search
  47. of the United States. In Beers v. Arkansas
    Search
  48. Railway Company v. Whitton
    Search
  49. and Smyth v. Ames
    Search
  50. Davis v. Gray
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial