Citation network
Smith Vs. Reeves
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 14, 1900
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 436 (1900) U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. ReevesSearch
-
U.S. 436 (1900) Smith v. ReevesSearch
-
or of the action. The demurrer was sustained with leave to amend, and the motion to dismiss was denied. Reinhart v. McDonaldSearch
-
with leave to amend. No further amendment having been filed, the action was dismissed by the circuit court. Smith v. RackliffeSearch
-
defendant asserts or suggests that the right of possession is in the state of which he is an officer or agent. Tindal v. WesleySearch
-
been taken from them under an illegal assessment. The case, in some material aspects, is like that of Louisiana v. JunelSearch
-
respect of the matters specified in that section, and it is argued that this case comes within the decision in Beers v. ArkansasSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
So, in Clark v. BarnardSearch
-
take nor surrender jurisdiction except pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the United States. In Beers v. ArkansasSearch
-
could not restrict its consent to be sued to actions brought in its own courts, counsel refer to Railway Company v. WhittonSearch
-
Reagan v. Farmers'Search
-
Loan & Trust Co., 154 U. S. 362 , 154 U. S. 391 , and Smyth v. AmesSearch
-
U. S. 466 , 169 U. S. 516 . Railway Company v. WhittonSearch
-
Bardon v. LandSearch
-
jurisdiction attaches by reason of diverse citizenship or upon any other ground of federal jurisdiction. Payne v. HookSearch
-
that the wise policy of the Constitution gives him a choice of tribunals. Davis v. GraySearch
-
Cowley v. NorthernSearch
-
In Smyth v. AmesSearch
-
the Court distinctly reaffirmed what was said upon this point in Reagan v. Farmers'Search
-
contention rests upon the ground that the Eleventh Amendment -- which was passed because of the decision in Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
this suit having been brought by a federal corporation created for national purposes, Osborn v. BankSearch
-
California v. CentralSearch
-
Northern Pacific Railroad Co. v. AmatoSearch
-
We cannot approve this interpretation. This question is controlled by the principles announced in Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
In the opinion in that case, delivered by Mr. Justice Bradley, reference was made to the question involved in Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
or laws of the United States, is clearly established by the decisions of this Court in several recent cases. Louisiana v. JunelSearch
-
asserted. . . . 'It may be accepted as a point of departure unquestioned,' said Mr. Justice Miller, in Cunningham v. MaconSearch
-
Undoubtedly a state may be sued by its own consent, as was the case in Curran v. ArkansasSearch
-
How. 304, 56 U. S. 309 , and in Clark v. BarnardSearch
-
law which the legislature passed in conformity to the Constitution of that state. But this Court decided, in Beers v. ArkansasSearch
-
on public law. It is enough for us to declare its existence. The present plaintiffs, as did the plaintiffs in Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
Constitution. We deem it unnecessary to repeat Page 178 U. S. 449 or enlarge upon the reasons given in Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. ReevesSearch
-
Reinhart v. McDonaldSearch
-
Smith v. RackliffeSearch
-
of Louisiana v. JunelSearch
-
Beers v. ArkansasSearch
-
Clark v. BarnardSearch
-
of the United States. In Beers v. ArkansasSearch
-
Railway Company v. WhittonSearch
-
and Smyth v. AmesSearch
-
Davis v. GraySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial