Citation network
Loeb Vs. Columbia Township Trustees
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 10, 1900
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Loeb v. ColumbiaSearch
-
Township Trustees - 179 U.S. 472 (1900) U.S. Supreme Court Loeb v. ColumbiaSearch
-
Township Trustees, 179 U.S. 472 (1900) Loeb v. ColumbiaSearch
-
court erred in holding that the petition in this case made a case that brought it within the decision in Norwood v. BakerSearch
-
point was decided for the defendant, the court being of opinion that, according to the principles laid down in Norwood v. BakerSearch
-
for, as said in Robinson v. CaldwellSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Colorado Central Consolidation Mining Co. v. TurckSearch
-
Page 179 U. S. 480 applied the Constitution to the case, and put the plaintiff out of court. Cornell v. GreenSearch
-
of the United States. The views expressed by us as to the scope of the act of 1891 are supported by Holder v. AultmanSearch
-
and the jurisdiction of this Court is not limited to the constitutional question, but includes the whole case. Whitten v. TomlinsonSearch
-
Penn Ins. Co. v. AustinSearch
-
It is said that we cannot, and that view is supposed to be sustained by England v. GebhardtSearch
-
part of the pleadings or process in the cause, it must be put into the record by some action of the court. Sargeant v. StateSearch
-
Fisher v. CockerellSearch
-
In United States v. TaylorSearch
-
that, even in writs of error to a state court, the opinion of the court below was not a part of the record, Williams v. NorrisSearch
-
Wall. 314, but the inconvenience of this rule became so great that it was subsequently changed, Murdock v. MemphisSearch
-
In Sayward v. DennySearch
-
citing, among other cases, United States v. TaylorSearch
-
Some light is thrown upon this question by the decisions in cases from the highest courts of the states. In Murdock v. PageSearch
-
The subject was again considered in Gross v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 486 , which came from the Supreme Court of Illinois. After referring to what was said in Murdock v. MemphisSearch
-
deemed a citizen of that state for purposes of suit by or against it in the courts of the United States. In Cowles v. MercerSearch
-
McCoy v. WashingtonSearch
-
And it is the settled law of Ohio that a township is suable on account of any liabilities incurred by it. Harding v. TrusteesSearch
-
Trustees of Concord Township v. MillerSearch
-
Wilson v. TrusteesSearch
-
It was created for purposes of local administration, and is a corporation. Fairfield Township v. LaddSearch
-
Lane v. StateSearch
-
was a corporation, was entitled to sue upon them without reference to the citizenship of any prior holder. Thompson v. PerrineSearch
-
was dismissed. Looking at all the provisions of the statute, that court held that the case was embraced by Norwood v. BakerSearch
-
the Constitution of the United States, prohibiting the taking of property without due process of law. In Norwood v. BakerSearch
-
court erred in holding that the petition made a case that necessarily brought it within the decision in Norwood v. BakerSearch
-
adjoining property owners, and that an assessment under that section would be invalid under the decision in Norwood v. BakerSearch
-
be carried into effect without reference to the third section. So that, if that section were held void under Norwood v. BakerSearch
-
made by the township and its cost met by issuing bonds. We think the case comes within Fayette County Treasurer v. People'sSearch
-
the Supreme Court of Ohio made prior to the issuing of these bonds. Those decisions were to the contrary. In Hibbs v. CommissionersSearch
-
But in State v. CommissionersSearch
-
Ohio St. 333, and Hixson v. BursonSearch
-
Ohio St. 470, decided in 1896, the principle announced in Hibbs v. CommissionersSearch
-
In the latter case, the court expressly overruled the second syllabus in Hibbs v. CommissionersSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial