Citation network
Workman Vs. New York City
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 21, 1900
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Workman v. NewSearch
-
York City - 179 U.S. 552 (1900) U.S. Supreme Court Workman v. NewSearch
-
York City, 179 U.S. 552 (1900) Workman v. NewSearch
-
though in conflict with the maritime law, it must be borne in mind that the issue is not -- as was the case in Detroit v. OsborneSearch
-
law the doctrine that wrong can be done with impunity were very aptly pointed out in Mersey Docks & Harbour Board v. GibbsSearch
-
And still later, in deciding the case of Currie v. McKnightSearch
-
In Liverpool Steam Co. v. PhenixSearch
-
to be an American contract, and the local law of New York was declared not to govern in its construction. In Butler v. BostonSearch
-
vessel committing a maritime tort is responsible, under the rule of respondeat superior, is elementary. Thorp v. HammondSearch
-
as a matter of public policy, be enforced by the levy on property held by the corporation for public uses. Meriwether v. GarrettSearch
-
And in accord with this doctrine is the local law of New Page 179 U. S. 572 York. Thus, in Farley v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and the master and crew of the vessel at the time of the negligent collision was that of master and servant. Thorp v. HammondSearch
-
That question, from the aspect of both the common and municipal law, was considered by this Court in Weightman v. WashingtonSearch
-
Barnes v. DistrictSearch
-
of Columbia (1875), 91 U. S. 540 , and in District of Columbia v. WoodburySearch
-
against a city for negligence of members of its fire department while discharging their duty as such. Hafford v. NewSearch
-
Fisher v. BostonSearch
-
Pettingell v. ChelseaSearch
-
Burrill v. AugustaSearch
-
Edgerly v. ConcordSearch
-
Welsh v. RutlandSearch
-
Dodge v. GrangerSearch
-
Jewett v. NewSearch
-
Wild v. PatersonSearch
-
Hayes v. OshkoshSearch
-
Howard v. SanSearch
-
property by a defect in the construction or repair of either by the negligence of the commissioner of highways. Hutson v. NewSearch
-
Conrad v. IthacaSearch
-
Requa v. RochesterSearch
-
Hume v. NewSearch
-
Ehrgott v. NewSearch
-
Hughes v. MonroeSearch
-
Missano v. NewSearch
-
or even of the department of public charities, of public health, or of public instruction. In Maxmilian v. NewSearch
-
the whole public in the discharge of its duty to care for paupers, lunatics, and prisoners. 62 N.Y. 168. In Ham v. NewSearch
-
construction of a schoolhouse by the department of public instruction of the city. More directly in point is Smith v. RochesterSearch
-
N.Y. 513. In Terhune v. NewSearch
-
N.Y. 251. See also Springfield Ins. Co. v. KeesevilleSearch
-
N.Y. 46. Quite in line with these decisions is Farley v. NewSearch
-
to show that such negligence could render the city liable to third persons. In the very recent case of Missano v. NewSearch
-
Barney Co. v. NewSearch
-
York (1889), 40 F. 50. See also Hughes v. AuburnSearch
-
and the decisions of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York in Haight v. NewSearch
-
York (1885), 24 F. 93, and in Edgerton v. NewSearch
-
Knight v. PhiladelphiaSearch
-
Fire Insurance Patrol v. BoydSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial