Citation network
Kenaday Vs. Sinnott
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 24, 1900
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 606 (1900) U.S. Supreme Court Kenaday v. SinnottSearch
-
U.S. 606 (1900) Kenaday v. SinnottSearch
-
of Edwards v. MaupinSearch
-
in cases of writs of error or appeals from judgments in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. In Ormsby v. WebbSearch
-
Campbell v. PorterSearch
-
are considered and applied in well nigh innumerable cases. Many of them will be found cited in the notes to Ashburner v. MacguireSearch
-
Tudor's Leading Cases in Equity, Part II, Fourth American Edition from Fourth London Edition, p. 600. In Walton v. WaltonSearch
-
Kent reviews the subject at large with his usual ability, and criticizes the observation of Lord Thurlow in Stanley v. PotterSearch
-
In Wilcox v. WilcoxSearch
-
to construe legacies to be specific, and will not do so unless such be the clear intention of the testator. Kirby v. PotterSearch
-
Attorney General v. ParkinSearch
-
Briggs v. HosfordSearch
-
Boardman v. BoardmanSearch
-
In Tifft v. PorterSearch
-
And so Alvey, C.J., in Gelbach v. ShivelySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
not be deprived of his legacy, but he will be permitted to receive it out of the general assets of the estate. Dugan v. HollinsSearch
-
that it is to be treated as a general legacy after the application of the fund designated for its payment. Mullins v. SmithSearch
-
of the testator. . . . It is certainly true, as a general proposition, as was said by the Vice Chancellor in Dickin v. EdwardsSearch
-
that the subsequent change was an ademption, and so a rule of law, rather than a question of intention. In Towle v. SwaseySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Kenaday v. SinnottSearch
-
of Edwards v. MaupinSearch
-
the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. In Ormsby v. WebbSearch
-
Campbell v. PorterSearch
-
Ashburner v. MacguireSearch
-
In Walton v. WaltonSearch
-
Stanley v. PotterSearch
-
Kirby v. PotterSearch
-
Gelbach v. ShivelySearch
-
Dugan v. HollinsSearch
-
Mullins v. SmithSearch
-
Dickin v. EdwardsSearch
-
In Towle v. SwaseySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial