Citation network
Jones Vs. Meehan
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Oct 30, 1899
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 1 (1899) U.S. Supreme Court Jones v. MeehanSearch
-
U.S. 1 (1899) Jones v. MeehanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
not be conveyed by the Indians to anyone but the United States, without the consent of the United States. Johnson v. McIntoshSearch
-
Buttz v. NorthernSearch
-
Pacific Railroad, 119 U. S. 55 , 119 U. S. 67 . In the leading case of Johnson v. McIntoshSearch
-
and the tribe, without any act of Congress, or any patent from the Executive authority of the United States. Johnson v. McIntoshSearch
-
Mitchel v. UnitedSearch
-
Doe v. BeardsleySearch
-
New York Indians v. UnitedSearch
-
has become more and more appropriate as they have grown less powerful and more dependent. Cherokee Nation v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Stephens v. CherokeeSearch
-
its words to learned lawyers, but in the sense in which they would naturally be understood by the Indians. Worcester v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Choctaw Nation v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 119 U. S. 1 , 119 U. S. 27 -28. In the leading case of Worcester v. GeorgiaSearch
-
might include a purchase or lease from any Indian acting by authority derived from his tribe only. Johnson v. McIntoshSearch
-
Goodell v. JacksonSearch
-
and improvement of such persons or to be located on any unimproved and unoccupied land. 7 Stat. 340. In Gaines v. NicholsonSearch
-
judgments of the Court, to be presently considered, one of which was delivered by the same learned judge. Crews v. BurchamSearch
-
from the Caddo nation to Grappe and his three sons. 7 Stat. 473. In United States v. BrooksSearch
-
Stat. 399-401. In Doe v. WilsonSearch
-
How. 64 U. S. 463 -464. In Crews v. BurchamSearch
-
to one Armstrong was accordingly held to vest the legal title in him, and the scope and effect of the decision in Doe v. WilsonSearch
-
patent had issued to the deceased in his lifetime. . . . Some expressions in the opinion delivered in the case of Doe v. WilsonSearch
-
And the two decisions were cited and approved by this Court, speaking by Mr. Justice Matthews, in Prentice v. StearnsSearch
-
U. S. 446 -447. See also the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Miller in the circuit court in Prentice v. NorthernSearch
-
should be authorized to sell the lands for their benefit and to issue patents to the purchasers. 12 Stat. 21. In Smith v. StevensSearch
-
Yet in Best v. PolkSearch
-
Niles v. AndersonSearch
-
Wray v. DoeSearch
-
Stat. 1238. In Libby v. ClarkSearch
-
Of course, under such a provision, no alienation could be valid without the approval of the President. Pickering v. LomaxSearch
-
Stat. 390. That provision might not enable individual Indians to alienate lands which were not before alienable. Beck v. FlournoySearch
-
Eells v. RossSearch
-
a matter within the discretion of the court, largely depending upon the circumstances of the particular case. Hardin v. BoydSearch
-
Smith v. BabcockSearch
-
of by considering what the effect of those facts would have been had they been duly pleaded. Liverpool Steam Co. v. PhenixSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Jones v. MeehanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial