Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

New Orleans Vs. Warner

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 13, 1899

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

75 entries 3 linked 72 unlinked
Show
  1. Lewis Vs. Hawkins US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1874
    Relied / Followed
  2. Fletcher Vs. Peck US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1810
  3. Hook Vs. Payne US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1871
  4. U.S. 120 (1899) U.S. Supreme Court New Orleans v. Warner
    Search
  5. U.S. 120 (1899) New Orleans v. Warner
    Search
  6. reducing its own claim to judgment, it neither ceased to be debtor nor trustee. The judgment and decree in Peake v. New
    Search
  7. six times as much as he then paid for it is one that cannot be considered here, as, from the decision in Fletcher v. Peck
    Search
  8. and the collection of assessments therefor. The facts of the case are so fully set forth in the cases of Peake v. New
    Search
  9. Orleans, 139 U. S. 342 , and Warner v. New
    Search
  10. decided adversely to complainant's pretensions by Page 175 U. S. 126 the circuit court in the case of Peake v. New
    Search
  11. of its own liability to that fund as assessee of the streets and squares, and second, whether the decision in Peake v. New
    Search
  12. the second it declined to answer. Warner v. New
    Search
  13. or not. Conditional obligations which lack these essential characteristics do not come within its provisions. Baird v. Livingston
    Search
  14. Bank of Louisiana v. Williams
    Search
  15. Thompson v. Simmons
    Search
  16. Jouett v. Erwin
    Search
  17. Gasquet v. City
    Search
  18. King Iron Bridge Co. v. Otoe
    Search
  19. that it was not, as had been held in the former case of Peake v. New
    Search
  20. to the fund, and not to itself. The duty of the city to collect these assessments was affirmed in state, Van Norden v. New
    Search
  21. Orleans, 27 La.Ann. 497. See Page 175 U. S. 130 also Cumming v. Brooklyn
    Search
  22. Atchison v. Byrnes
    Search
  23. In Oliver v. Piatt
    Search
  24. and vendee, tenants in common, or trustee and cestuis que trust, the statute does not begin to run. Zeller v. Eckert
    Search
  25. McKnight v. Calhoun
    Search
  26. respect to taxes levied for a particular purpose, as to which the city was held to be a trustee, in School Directors v. Shreveport
    Search
  27. Stevens v. Gaylord
    Search
  28. Sigourney v. Wetherell
    Search
  29. Leland v. Felton
    Search
  30. court below, is set up as arising from the decree of the circuit court, affirmed by this Court in the case of Peake v. New
    Search
  31. to this litigation, and that the decree was binding only upon Peake and such others as actually intervened. Hook v. Payne
    Search
  32. whereby, by reason of her conduct in abandoning her system of drainage, the Supreme Court of Louisiana, in Davidson v. New
    Search
  33. the further prosecution of the work, which resulted in the decision of the supreme court in the case of Davidson v. New
    Search
  34. of its obligation to the holders of these purchase warrants was settled upon the prior hearing of this case. Warner v. New
    Search
  35. above cited. This expected decision was delivered in March, 1882, Page 175 U. S. 137 in the case of Davidson v. New
    Search
  36. it as the agent of the entire body of its citizens, who are assumed to have been benefited to that extent. Charnock v. Levee
    Search
  37. In Marquez v. New
    Search
  38. ground of its ownership of this public ground. This case was subsequently approved in the similar case of Correjolles v. Foucher
    Search
  39. La.Ann. 362, and in Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Gogreve
    Search
  40. La.Ann. 251, 259. In McLean County v. Bloomington
    Search
  41. This ruling was followed in Adams County v. Quincy
    Search
  42. The rule is different in Massachusetts, Worcester County v. Worcester
    Search
  43. Mass. 193, and perhaps also in Connecticut, State v. Hartford
    Search
  44. that the city is not liable, and that in such cases the amount should not be paid out of the treasury. Adams County v. Quincy
    Search
  45. be doubted whether the legislature could impose the cost of draining public property upon private lot owners. Sears v. Street
    Search
  46. as conclusive. A judgment for taxes does not differ from any other in respect to its conclusiveness. United States v. New
    Search
  47. Driggers v. Cassady
    Search
  48. Cadmus v. Jackson
    Search
  49. Mayo v. Foley
    Search
  50. Page 175 U. S. 142 Anderson v. Rider
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial