Citation network
New Orleans Vs. Stempel
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 04, 1899
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 309 (1899) U.S. Supreme Court New Orleans v. StempelSearch
-
U.S. 309 (1899) New Orleans v. StempelSearch
-
Insurance Co. v. BoardSearch
-
We are dealing exclusively with the question of credits as assessed, and we hold, as decided in Meyer v. PleasantSearch
-
La.Ann. 645, Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. NewSearch
-
The same proposition was affirmed in the succeeding case, Railey v. BoardSearch
-
In Clason v. NewSearch
-
This decision was, however, qualified in Bluefield Banana Co. v. BoardSearch
-
This was reaffirmed in Parker v. StraussSearch
-
Insurance Company v. BoardSearch
-
the purposes of collection and deposit or reinvestment within the state, its taxable situs is in the state. See Catlin v. HullSearch
-
In Goldgart v. PeopleSearch
-
In Wilcox v. EllisSearch
-
The same doctrine was affirmed in Fisher v. CommissionersSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Kan. 414, and again in Blain v. IrbySearch
-
decisions of the highest courts of New York, in which state these plaintiffs reside, are to the same effect. In People v. TrusteesSearch
-
belonging to a nonresident creditor may be taxed in the place where the obligations are held by his agent. Hoyt v. CommissionersSearch
-
People v. GardnerSearch
-
Catlin v. HullSearch
-
This proposition was reaffirmed in People ex Rel. v. SmithSearch
-
People v. HomeSearch
-
Billinghurst v. SpinkSearch
-
Poppleton v. YamhillSearch
-
Redmond v. CommissionersSearch
-
Finch v. YorkSearch
-
bond, was as to nonresidents a law impairing the obligation of contracts. The same proposition was affirmed in Murray v. CharlestonSearch
-
where the City of Charleston attempted to tax its obligations held by nonresidents of the state. In Tappan v. Merchants'Search
-
persons of their owners for purposes of taxation, and give them a situs of their own. See also Pullman's Car Company v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
from the person of the owner for purposes of taxation was discussed at length. As also the case of Savings Society v. MultnomahSearch
-
was adjudged valid although the owner of the mortgage was a nonresident. Nor is there anything in the case of Kirtland v. HotchkissSearch
-
U. S. 322 such levy and sale are California, Indiana, Kentucky, New York, Tennessee, Iowa, and Louisiana. Brown v. AndersonSearch
-
affirmed the rightfulness of such a levy and sale. In Fluker v. BullardSearch
-
In the case of Simpson v. AllainSearch
-
that the sheriff should take the property levied upon into actual possession. 7 Rob. 504. In the case of Goubeau v. NewSearch
-
The same doctrine was reaffirmed in Stockton v. StanbroughSearch
-
It has also been held that a note may be made the subject of seizure and delivery in a replevin suit. Graff v. ShannonSearch
-
Smith v. EalsSearch
-
Pritchard v. NorwoodSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court New Orleans v. StempelSearch
-
Meyer v. PleasantSearch
-
Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. NewSearch
-
Railey v. BoardSearch
-
Bluefield Banana Co. v. BoardSearch
-
Parker v. StraussSearch
-
See Catlin v. HullSearch
-
Fisher v. CommissionersSearch
-
Blain v. IrbySearch
-
In People v. TrusteesSearch
-
Hoyt v. CommissionersSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial