Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Hays Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 04, 1899

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

41 entries 3 linked 38 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Reading US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1855
  2. Sparks Vs. Pierce US Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1885
  3. United States Vs. Cambuston US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1857
  4. Hays v. United
    Search
  5. States - 175 U.S. 248 (1899) U.S. Supreme Court Hays v. United
    Search
  6. States, 175 U.S. 248 (1899) Hays v. United
    Search
  7. methods of disposing of public lands becomes still more important. These regulations are stated in United States v. Cambuston
    Search
  8. How. 59, and United States v. Bolton
    Search
  9. Hornsby v. United
    Search
  10. said with respect to a somewhat similar state of facts connected with an alleged grant of land in California, Luco v. United
    Search
  11. In the case of Peralta v. United
    Search
  12. has been lost or destroyed, he will then be permitted to give secondary evidence of its contents. See also Fuentes v. United
    Search
  13. of Spain or Mexico that such power existed. Indeed, such want of power is admitted by the petitioner. See Reynolds v. West
    Search
  14. Crespin v. United
    Search
  15. within the meaning of the Court of Private Land Claims Act. In Crespin v. United
    Search
  16. Bergere v. United
    Search
  17. Hayes v. Page
    Search
  18. is a question which does not arise in this case, where the possession did not exceed six years. See Lindsey v. Miller
    Search
  19. Webber v. Harbor
    Search
  20. but there was no requirement as above stated with regard to the Court of Private Land Claims Act. In United States v. Chaves
    Search
  21. The doctrine at the foundation of that case is thus stated by Mr. Justice Story in Ricard v. Williams
    Search
  22. is claimed from a deed which is shown to be void, it will not be presumed that there was an independent grant, Smith v. Higbee
    Search
  23. Vt. 124, or where surrounding circumstances are inconsistent with the theory of a grant. Townsend v. Downer
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Hays v. United
    Search
  25. and United States v. Bolton
    Search
  26. California, Luco v. United
    Search
  27. of Peralta v. United
    Search
  28. Fuentes v. United
    Search
  29. See Reynolds v. West
    Search
  30. of the Court of Private Land Claims Act. In Crespin v. United
    Search
  31. Bergere v. United
    Search
  32. See Lindsey v. Miller
    Search
  33. the Court of Private Land Claims Act. In United States v. Chaves
    Search
  34. Ricard v. Williams
    Search
  35. Smith v. Higbee
    Search
  36. Townsend v. Downer
    Search
  37. United States v. Vigil
    Search
  38. United States v. Knight
    Search
  39. United States v. Vallejo
    Search
  40. Gibson v. Chouteau
    Search
  41. Redfield v. Parks
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial