Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Wilson Vs. Lambert

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 08, 1898

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 1 linked 27 unlinked
Show
  1. Ogden City Vs. Armstrong US Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1897
  2. U.S. 611 (1898) U.S. Supreme Court Wilson v. Lambert
    Search
  3. U.S. 611 (1898) Wilson v. Lambert
    Search
  4. law, but which is unconstitutional, and therefore does not avail to confer the powers sought to be exercised. Dows v. Chicago
    Search
  5. Union Pac. Page 168 U. S. 613 Railway Co. v. Cheyenne
    Search
  6. of the section in question has been heretofore considered and determined by this Court in the case of Shoemaker v. United
    Search
  7. numbers. This latter proposition, however, was not approved by the courts below, and we need not discuss it. Craighill v. Van
    Search
  8. estates of the petitioners had not been benefited by what had been done at the time the assessment was made. Foster v. Commissioners
    Search
  9. Holt v. Summerville
    Search
  10. Owners of Ground v. Albany
    Search
  11. public use, and the right to assess benefits upon adjacent property was assumed as unquestionable. Brooklyn Park Com. v. Armstrong
    Search
  12. the condemnation of lands for the purpose of public parks has been affirmed by the Supreme Court of Illinois, People v. Williams
    Search
  13. Cook v. South
    Search
  14. West Chicago Park Com. v. Western
    Search
  15. Union Tel. Co., 103 Ill. 33, and by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Mercer v. Pittsburgh
    Search
  16. Fort Wayne & Chicago Railroad Co., 36 Penn.St. 99, and by the Supreme Court of Missouri, St. Louis County v. Griswold
    Search
  17. from that supposed distinction. That has been so recently and so fully discussed by this Court in the case of Bauman v. Ross
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court Wilson v. Lambert
    Search
  19. Dows v. Chicago
    Search
  20. Railway Co. v. Cheyenne
    Search
  21. of Shoemaker v. United
    Search
  22. Craighill v. Van
    Search
  23. Foster v. Commissioners
    Search
  24. Brooklyn Park Com. v. Armstrong
    Search
  25. the Supreme Court of Illinois, People v. Williams
    Search
  26. the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Mercer v. Pittsburgh
    Search
  27. the Supreme Court of Missouri, St. Louis County v. Griswold
    Search
  28. of Bauman v. Ross
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial