Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Wetmore Vs. Rymer

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 17, 1898

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 6 linked 20 unlinked
Show
  1. Barry Vs. Edmunds US Supreme Court · Feb 07, 1886
  2. Hartog Vs. Memory US Supreme Court · Feb 01, 1886
  3. Morris Vs. Gilmer US Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1889
  4. Deputron Vs. Young US Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1890
  5. Shields Vs. Coleman US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1895
  6. Arthurs Vs. Hart US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1854
    Distinguished
  7. U.S. 115 (1898) U.S. Supreme Court Wetmore v. Rymer
    Search
  8. U.S. 115 (1898) Wetmore v. Rymer
    Search
  9. accordingly heretofore held that the action of the circuit courts in such cases is subject to our revision. Williams v. Nottawa
    Search
  10. Co. v. Kelly
    Search
  11. U. S. 119 such question of the jurisdiction of the circuit court alone is presented for our decision. Shields v. Coleman
    Search
  12. or is a matter of law arising from a fact found, or not denied, and which has been overruled by the court. Arthurs v. Hart
    Search
  13. of the court could only be raised by a plea in abatement in the nature of a plea to the jurisdiction. See Farmington v. Pillsbury
    Search
  14. if led to believe that its jurisdiction is not properly invoked, inquire into the facts as they really exist. Williams v. Nottawa
    Search
  15. to the review by this Court which was intended by Congress. Such was the course pursued in the case of Jones v. League
    Search
  16. given by the trial court was considered. A similar course was followed in the case of Northwestern Railway v. Ohle
    Search
  17. whether the conclusion of the court below was warranted by the evidence before that court. Thus, in Barry v. Edmunds
    Search
  18. In Hartog v. Memory
    Search
  19. And this language from Barry v. Edmunds
    Search
  20. was quoted with approval in the case of Deputron v. Young
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court Wetmore v. Rymer
    Search
  22. Williams v. Nottawa
    Search
  23. See Farmington v. Pillsbury
    Search
  24. of Jones v. League
    Search
  25. of Northwestern Railway v. Ohle
    Search
  26. of Deputron v. Young
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial