Citation network
Holden Vs. Hardy
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 28, 1898
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 366 (1898) U.S. Supreme Court Holden v. HardySearch
-
U.S. 366 (1898) Holden v. HardySearch
-
are those wherein the colored race was alleged to have been denied the right of representation upon juries, Strauder v. WestSearch
-
wherein the State was charged with oppressing and unduly discriminating against persons of the Chinese race, Barbier v. ConnollySearch
-
U. S. 36 , and Chy Lung v. FreemanSearch
-
under this amendment to enforce the right of women to suffrage and to admission to the learned professions, Minor v. HappersettSearch
-
Bradwell v. TheSearch
-
than the others. A reference to a few of these cases may not be inappropriate in this connection. Thus, in Walker v. SauvinetSearch
-
rulings with regard to the necessity of a jury, or of a judicial trial in special proceedings, were made in Kennard v. LouisianaSearch
-
Davidson v. NewSearch
-
Ex parte Wall, 107 U. S. 265 . In Hurtado v. CaliforniaSearch
-
upon such an information, followed by sentence of death, was not illegal under the Fourteenth Amendment. In Hayes v. MissouriSearch
-
that there was no error in refusing to limit the State's peremptory challenges to eight In Missouri Railway Co. v. MackeySearch
-
and cattle guards, and make them liable in double the amount of damages claimed for the want of them. In Hallinger v. DavisSearch
-
held that the law providing for capital punishment by electricity was not repugnant to this amendment. And in Duncan v. MissouriSearch
-
considered within the constitutional inhibition. See also Medley, Petitioner, 134 U. S. 160 , and Holden v. MinnesotaSearch
-
although the substitution of prosecution by information in lieu of indictment was recognized as valid in Hurtado v. CaliforniaSearch
-
as they arise. Similar views have been heretofore expressed by this court. Thus, in the case of Missouri v. LewisSearch
-
same subject was also elaborately discussed by Mr. Justice Matthews in delivering the opinion of this court in Hurtado v. CaliforniaSearch
-
What shall constitute due process of law was perhaps as well stated by Mr. Justice Curtis in Murray's Lessees v. HobokenSearch
-
It was said by Mr. Justice Miller, in delivering the opinion of this court in Davidson v. NewSearch
-
be equally invalid. The latest utterance of this court upon this subject is contained in the case of Allgeyer v. LouisianaSearch
-
wellbeing and protection, or the safety of adjacent property. While this court has held, notably in the cases Davidson v. NewSearch
-
Orleans, 96 U. S. 97 , and Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
upon this power are admirably stated by Chief Justice Shaw in the following extract from his opinion in Commonwealth v. AlgerSearch
-
made subject to stringent police regulations. The power to do this has been repeatedly affirmed by this court. Stone v. MississippiSearch
-
validity assumed, and, so far as we are informed, they have been uniformly held to be constitutional. In Daniels v. HilgardSearch
-
with such determination unless the legislature had manifestly transcended its province. See also Litchfield Coal Co. v. TaylorSearch
-
Illinois 590. In Commonwealth v. BonnellSearch
-
tubes, and the protection of cages was held to be constitutional and subject to strict enforcement. Commonwealth v. ConynghamSearch
-
Durant v. LexingtonSearch
-
to women, has been doubted in some of the States, they have been generally upheld. Thus, in the case of Commonwealth v. HamiltonSearch
-
of enactments cannot be better stated than by a comparison of the views of this court found in the opinions in Barbier v. ConnollySearch
-
U. S. 27 , and Soon Hing v. CrowleySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial