Citation network
Norwood Vs. Baker
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 12, 1898
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 269 (1898) U.S. Supreme Court Norwood v. BakerSearch
-
U.S. 269 (1898) Norwood v. BakerSearch
-
Railroad v. ChicagoSearch
-
Long Island Water Supply Co. v. CitySearch
-
offspring of political necessity, and inseparable from sovereignty, unless denied to it by the fundamental law. Searl v. LakeSearch
-
that special burdens may be imposed for special or peculiar benefits accruing from public improvements. Mobile County v. KimballSearch
-
Illinois Central Railroad v. DecaturSearch
-
public improvement and which may be subjected to special assessment to meet the cost of such improvement. In Williams v. EgglestonSearch
-
equity when its aid is invoked to restrain the enforcement of a special assessment. In Illinois Central Railroad v. DecaturSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
In Macon v. PattySearch
-
In McCormack v. PatchinSearch
-
Zoeller v. KelloggSearch
-
The importance of the question before us renders it appropriate to refer to some of those cases. In State v. NewarkSearch
-
So, in Bogert v. ElizabethSearch
-
Page 172 U. S. 285 In Hammett v. PhiladelphiaSearch
-
In Barnes v. DyerSearch
-
In Thomas v. GainSearch
-
constituting an attempt to appropriate private property to public uses. This idea is strongly stated in Tide-Water Co. v. CosterSearch
-
In the case of Tide-Water Co. v. CosterSearch
-
It is said that the judgment below is not in accord with the decision of the Supreme Court of Ohio in Cleveland City v. WickSearch
-
unless he tenders or offers to pay what he admits or what is seen to be due. That rule is thus stated in National Bank v. KimballSearch
-
The same principle was announced in Northern Pacific Railroad v. ClarkSearch
-
U. S. 252 , 153 U. S. 272 . In Cummings v. NationalSearch
-
on the common law or equity side of the docket as the nature of the new right or new remedy requires. Van Norden v. MortonSearch
-
compensation. It has been suggested that what has been said by us is not consistent with our decision in Parsons v. DistrictSearch
-
power. A similar objection was disposed of by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in the case of Leominster v. ConantSearch
-
have been presented. Nor do we think that the present case is necessarily controlled by the decision in Spencer v. MerchantSearch
-
the cost of which, under the Constitution of Ohio, may be charged against the property benefited. City of Cleveland v. WickSearch
-
Ohio St. 304. 2. Equally true is this under the Constitution of the United States. Shoemaker v. UnitedSearch
-
powers) to determine the area benefited by such improvements, and the legislative determination is conclusive. Spencer v. MerchantSearch
-
district which should be taxed for a local improvement is within the province of legislative discretion. Willard v. PresburySearch
-
Davidson v. NewSearch
-
Mobile County v. KimballSearch
-
Hagar v. ReclamationSearch
-
Parsons v. DistrictSearch
-
propositions have been uniformly and consistently followed. See, among late cases, Northern Pacific Railroad v. ClarkSearch
-
U. S. 252 , 153 U. S. 272 . There is nothing in Cummings v. NationalSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Norwood v. BakerSearch
-
Searl v. LakeSearch
-
In Williams v. EgglestonSearch
-
In Illinois Central Railroad v. DecaturSearch
-
Zoeller v. KelloggSearch
-
In State v. NewarkSearch
-
Bogert v. ElizabethSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial