Citation network
United States Vs. Santa Fe
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 01, 1897
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
United States v. SantaSearch
-
Fe - 165 U.S. 675 (1897) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. SantaSearch
-
Fe, 165 U.S. 675 (1897) United States v. SantaSearch
-
which the city now asserts title. There is also a recognition of the exercise of this power referred to in Chouteau v. EckhartSearch
-
must make such grant, but that he would provisionally allow the town to occupy the land prayed for. So, in Lewis v. SanSearch
-
is no room for the application of a presumption of an actual grant, within the doctrine declared in United States v. ChavesSearch
-
the extent of the boundaries of the new pueblos should be subject to his uncontrolled discretion. Indeed, in Welch v. SullivanSearch
-
of the cases subsequently decided by the Supreme Court of California, cited in argument by the city, viz., Welch v. SullivanSearch
-
Cal. 168, Hart v. BurnettSearch
-
court of the United States. The latter court, in its opinion rendered on the hearing of the appeal, San Francisco v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
San Francisco v. UnitedSearch
-
act, the appeals of both the city and the United States which were pending in this Court were withdrawn. Townsend v. GreeleySearch
-
bases its right is sanctioned by previous adjudications of this Court. The decisions relied upon are Townsend v. GreeleySearch
-
An examination, however, of these cases, will show that they cannot be held to sustain the proposition. Townsend v. GreeleySearch
-
to the question before the court, and was not therefore a decision settling the matter. The decision in Grisar v. McDowellSearch
-
land, but the decision did not necessarily determine that question, as it was not before the court. In Brownsville v. CavazosSearch
-
review of the decisions of this Court relied on by the City of Santa Fe, we note the reference to the case of Lewis v. SanSearch
-
land surrounding it was, in any view, a part of the public domain, and passed as such to the United States. Mitchel v. UnitedSearch
-
Considering this subject, this Court, speaking through MR. JUSTICE FIELD in Grisar v. McDowellSearch
-
evidenced by the foregoing acts of Congress, which caused this Court, speaking through MR. JUSTICE FIELD in Grisar v. McDowellSearch
-
at the time of such cessions, rests upon the political, and not the judicial, department of the government. Le Bois v. BramallSearch
-
Ainsa v. UnitedSearch
-
seeking relief must present for adjudication a case clearly within the act, or relief cannot be given. United States v. ClarkeSearch
-
nature of the provisions of section 13 of the act of 1891 was considered and settled by this Court in Ainsa v. UnitedSearch
-
Roy, 138 U. S. 656 , and Knight v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. SantaSearch
-
Lewis v. SanSearch
-
Welch v. SullivanSearch
-
Hart v. BurnettSearch
-
In Brownsville v. CavazosSearch
-
of Lewis v. SanSearch
-
the United States. Mitchel v. UnitedSearch
-
Le Bois v. BramallSearch
-
and Knight v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. ClarkeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial