Citation network
Bauman Vs. Ross
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 10, 1897
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 548 (1897) U.S. Supreme Court Bauman v. RossSearch
-
U.S. 548 (1897) Bauman v. RossSearch
-
Van Ness v. WashingtonSearch
-
Potomac Steamboat Co. v. UpperSearch
-
District of Columbia v. BaltimoreSearch
-
has more than once been brought before this Court without a doubt of its constitutionality being expressed. Goszler v. GeorgetownSearch
-
Chesapeake & Ohio Canal v. KeySearch
-
Chesapeake & Ohio Canal v. UnionSearch
-
majority of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia within the last two of three years. District of Columbia v. ProspectSearch
-
Maryland & Washington Railway v. HillerSearch
-
Searl v. LakeSearch
-
Commonwealth v. CoombsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Mass. 489, 491. The same rule was recognized in Commonwealth v. NorfolkSearch
-
Sessions, 5 Mass. 435, and in Commonwealth v. MiddlesexSearch
-
Meacham v. FitchburgSearch
-
Cush. 291, 298-299. The rule as thus qualified has ever since been applied in Massachusetts to highways. Allen v. CharlestownSearch
-
Hilbourne v. SuffolkSearch
-
Cross v. PlymouthSearch
-
Livingston v. NewSearch
-
People v. BrooklynSearch
-
Granger v. SyracuseSearch
-
Genet v. BrooklynSearch
-
Eldridge v. BinghamtonSearch
-
Bohm v. MetropolitanSearch
-
Mangles v. HudsonSearch
-
N.J.L., 88, 92. The like rule has been upheld by the Court of Errors in the case of a railroad. Packard v. BergenSearch
-
Schuylkill Navigation Co. v. ThoburnSearch
-
S. & R. 411, 422. The rule, as thus stated, was recognized by Mr. Justice Strong in Watson v. PittsburghSearch
-
parcel, beyond the general increase in the value of property in the neighborhood, are to be deducted. Plank Road Co. v. ReaSearch
-
Railway Co. v. McCloskeySearch
-
Setzler v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Long v. HarrisburgSearch
-
Symonds v. CincinnatiSearch
-
Ohio, 147, 174-175. The same rule was followed so long as the constitution of 1802 was in force. Brown v. CincinnatiSearch
-
Kramer v. ClevelandSearch
-
Railroad v. SimpsonSearch
-
Pottawatomie Commissioners v. O'SullivanSearch
-
where the special benefits equaled or exceeded the damages, so that the owner of the land received nothing. Tobie v. BrownSearch
-
Trosper v. SabineSearch
-
was decided or intimated in the opinion of this Court delivered by MR. JUSTICE BREWER in Monongahela Navigation Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. 148 U. S. 326 . And on the next page, the opinion of the Supreme Court of Mississippi in Isom v. MississippiSearch
-
be determined by the legislature, the ascertainment of what is just compensation is a judicial inquiry. See Marchant v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSearch
-
U. S. 226 . The case, just decided, of Spokane Falls & Northern Railway v. ZieglerSearch
-
See Spokane Falls & Northern Railway v. ZieglerSearch
-
Enoch v. SpokaneSearch
-
constitution or statute, any which may be caused by a future change of the grade by the public authorities. Goszler v. GeorgetownSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial