Citation network
Compania De Navigacion La Flecha Vs. Brauer
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Oct 28, 1897
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 104 (1897) U.S. Supreme Court Compania de Navigacion la Flecha v. BrauerSearch
-
U.S. 104 (1897) Compania de Navigacion la Flecha v. BrauerSearch
-
of their own servants, and any stipulation for such exemption was contrary to public policy, and void. Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSearch
-
Liverpool Steam Co. v. PhenixSearch
-
exempt themselves by express contract from responsibility for losses occasioned by negligence of their servants. Peck v. NorthSearch
-
Page 168 U. S. 118 Steel v. StateSearch
-
Railway v. BrownSearch
-
Worsted Mills v. KnottSearch
-
and by Judge Butler in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in The Glenmavis, 69 F. 472. See also Oscanyan v. ArmsSearch
-
Hamlyn v. TaliskerSearch
-
Rousillon v. RousillonSearch
-
Norman v. BinningtonSearch
-
Baerselman v. BaileySearch
-
for the negligence of himself or his servants. In the leading case of New Jersey Steam Navigation Co. v. Merchants'Search
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Transportation Co. v. DownerSearch
-
that he and his servants shall use due care and skill, and shall not be negligent in carrying the goods. Phillips v. ClarkSearch
-
Lloyd v. GeneralSearch
-
Grill v. SameSearch
-
Czech v. GeneralSearch
-
Steel v. StateSearch
-
App.Cas. 503, 510, 515. The English case most resembling in its circumstances the case at bar is Leuw v. DudgeonSearch
-
And he treated the case as coming within the principle of that rule as affirmed in the cases, above cited, of Phillips v. ClarkSearch
-
and Grill v. GeneralSearch
-
held not to cover a loss, otherwise within the exception, caused by the negligence of the master or crew. So, in Steel v. StateSearch
-
shipowner to furnish a ship really fit for the purpose as had been applied, in the series of cases of which Phillips v. ClarkSearch
-
leading one, to the duty of himself and his servants to use due care and skill in carrying the goods. In Notara v. HendersonSearch
-
and dry the cargo at a port of distress, because the authorities (specially mentioning Grill Page 168 U. S. 122 v. GeneralSearch
-
In Gill v. ManchesterSearch
-
did not relieve the company from liability for negligence of its servants in delivering a restive cow. In Lloyd v. GeneralSearch
-
apply to an explosion caused by the willful act of the engineer. The passages quoted by the respondent from Burton v. EnglishSearch
-
did not exclude the right of the owner of the goods to recover in general average for a lawful jettison. See Ralli v. TroopSearch
-
accompanying cattle, under a free pass, one of the terms of which was that he should travel at his own risk. McCauley v. FurnessSearch
-
Lewis v. GreatSearch
-
Their concurrent decisions upon a question of fact are to be followed unless clearly shown to be erroneous. Morewood v. EnequistSearch
-
trust, nor willful violation of law, one of which, at least, is necessary to constitute barratry. Patapsco Ins. Co. v. CoulterSearch
-
Lawton v. SunSearch
-
Grill v. GeneralSearch
-
Flecha v. BrauerSearch
-
Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSearch
-
Peck v. NorthSearch
-
Oscanyan v. ArmsSearch
-
of New Jersey Steam Navigation Co. v. Merchants'Search
-
Phillips v. ClarkSearch
-
Leuw v. DudgeonSearch
-
of Phillips v. ClarkSearch
-
In Notara v. HendersonSearch
-
In Lloyd v. GeneralSearch
-
Burton v. EnglishSearch
-
See Ralli v. TroopSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial