Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

CrespIn Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 15, 1897

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 2 linked 30 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Percheman US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1832
  2. United States Vs. Workman US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1863
  3. Crespin v. United
    Search
  4. States - 168 U.S. 208 (1897) U.S. Supreme Court Crespin v. United
    Search
  5. States, 168 U.S. 208 (1897) Crespin v. United
    Search
  6. what were the laws of Mexico at any particular time, of which we are bound to take judicial notice, Fremont v. United
    Search
  7. Romero v. United
    Search
  8. these difficulties are of longstanding is evident from the comments of Chief Justice Marshall in the case of Soulard v. United
    Search
  9. could be obtained. In view of this and similar difficulties, this Court, as early as 1832, in United States v. Arredondo
    Search
  10. sufficient in law to rebut the legal presumption. To Page 168 U. S. 213 the same effect are United States v. Clark
    Search
  11. Reynolds v. West
    Search
  12. Jones v. Garza
    Search
  13. that he had authority to make the grant, and that the land was within the boundaries of the pueblo. Reynolds v. West
    Search
  14. Cohas v. Raisin
    Search
  15. Hart v. Burnett
    Search
  16. Payne v. Treadwell
    Search
  17. Leese v. Clark
    Search
  18. Donner v. Palmer
    Search
  19. Hornsby v. United
    Search
  20. Vanderslice v. Hanks
    Search
  21. Cal. 17, 18 Cal. 535, 546, but see Jones v. Garza
    Search
  22. United States v. Clark
    Search
  23. we have been able to find in which the power of prefects to make grants of public lands is discussed is that of Ohm v. San
    Search
  24. common lands. This Court has decided that it did not expressly confer power to grant lands in private ownership. Hart v. Burnett
    Search
  25. restrictions upon which previous confirmations by Congress of imperfect grants have no proper bearing. Rio Arriba Co. v. United
    Search
  26. U.S. Supreme Court Crespin v. United
    Search
  27. Fremont v. United
    Search
  28. of Soulard v. United
    Search
  29. of Ohm v. San
    Search
  30. Rio Arriba Co. v. United
    Search
  31. Strother v. Lucas
    Search
  32. United States v. Arredondo
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial