Citation network
Chappell Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 06, 1896
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Chappell v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 160 U.S. 499 (1896) U.S. Supreme Court Chappell v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 160 U.S. 499 (1896) Chappell v. UnitedSearch
-
petition and directing a jury to be impaneled was not a final judgment upon which a writ of error would lie. Luxton v. NorthSearch
-
specifying the question of jurisdiction, this Court cannot take jurisdiction under this clause of the statute. Maynard v. HechtSearch
-
Davis & Rankin Co. Co. v. BarberSearch
-
Interior Construction Co. v. GibneySearch
-
the question of jurisdiction is sufficiently certified. Shields v. ColemanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 168 . But in the case just cited, of Shields v. ColemanSearch
-
question, but of the entire case, including all questions, whether of jurisdiction or of merits. Nishimura Ekiu v. UnitedSearch
-
Horner v. UnitedSearch
-
United States with or without any consent or concurrent act of the state, as Congress may direct or permit. Harris v. ElliottSearch
-
Kohl v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. JonesSearch
-
Fort Leavenworth v. LoweSearch
-
Cherokee Nation v. KansasSearch
-
Monongahela Navigation Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Luxton v. NorthSearch
-
Burt v. Merchants'Search
-
N.Y. 227. Nor is it necessary that Congress should itself select the particular land to be taken. In Kohl v. UnitedSearch
-
Tide Water Canal Co. v. ArcherSearch
-
Stewart v. BaltimoreSearch
-
State v. GravesSearch
-
Luxton North River v. BridgeSearch
-
was rightly ordered to be amended so as to make the United States the formal, as they were the real, petitioner. Kohl v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. HopewellSearch
-
instituted and concluded in a court of the United States, was in substance and effect an action at law. Kohl v. UnitedSearch
-
Upshur Co. v. RichSearch
-
unwisely encumber the administration of justice in the courts of the United States. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSearch
-
Railway Co. v. PinkneySearch
-
of the United States to take, without compensation, for the purpose of a lighthouse, land under tide waters. Hill v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Chappell v. UnitedSearch
-
of Shields v. ColemanSearch
-
Nishimura Ekiu v. UnitedSearch
-
Harris v. ElliottSearch
-
In Kohl v. UnitedSearch
-
of the United States. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSearch
-
Hill v. UnitedSearch
-
Colvin v. JacksonvilleSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial