Citation network
Ball Vs. Halsell
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 02, 1896
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 72 (1896) U.S. Supreme Court Ball v. HalsellSearch
-
U.S. 72 (1896) Ball v. HalsellSearch
-
to keep in mind the acts of Congress and the decisions of this Court bearing upon the subject. In Kendall v. UnitedSearch
-
Marshall v. BaltimoreSearch
-
of Claims, and to make every such assignment void unless it has been assented to by the United States. United States v. GillisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Page 161 U. S. 79 Spofford v. KirkSearch
-
McKnight v. UnitedSearch
-
St. Paul & Duluth Railroad v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 242 , 149 U. S. 247 . In Spofford v. KirkSearch
-
Erwin v. UnitedSearch
-
Bailey v. UnitedSearch
-
to recover from the mortgagors and pledgors the amount of rents paid to them by the United States, Freedman's Co. v. ShepherdSearch
-
of the amount recovered in case of success, and nothing in case of failure, were held to be lawful and valid. Wylie v. CoxeSearch
-
The reason for upholding the validity of such contracts was first stated by Mr. Justice Miller in Taylor v. BemissSearch
-
U.S. 110 U. S. 45 . The proportion allowed to the attorneys in Wylie v. CoxeSearch
-
in Wright v. TebbittsSearch
-
in Stanton v. EmbreySearch
-
one-fifth, and in Taylor v. BemissSearch
-
States, or might be treated by him as absolutely null and void in any contest between him and the attorney. Kendall v. UnitedSearch
-
Missouri v. WalkerSearch
-
reliance was placed by the plaintiff upon the recent decision of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in Davis v. CommonwealthSearch
-
contract between him and Halsell, and he does not sue, and could not recover, upon a quantum meruit. Marshall v. BaltimoreSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ball v. HalsellSearch
-
In Kendall v. UnitedSearch
-
the United States. United States v. GillisSearch
-
In Spofford v. KirkSearch
-
the United States, Freedman's Co. v. ShepherdSearch
-
Kendall v. UnitedSearch
-
Davis v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Wylie v. CoxeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial