Citation network
Blagge Vs. Balch
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 18, 1896
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 439 (1896) U.S. Supreme Court Blagge v. BalchSearch
-
U.S. 439 (1896) Blagge v. BalchSearch
-
the claims raised an obligation under the Constitution to compensate the individual sufferers for their losses. Gray v. UnitedSearch
-
Holbrook v. UnitedSearch
-
Cushing v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 22 Ct.Cl. 28. As to the present ownership of the claims, the court, in Buchanan v. UnitedSearch
-
Davis, J., Gray v. UnitedSearch
-
brought within the category of payments by way of gratuity -- payments as of grace, and not of right. In Comegys v. VasseSearch
-
in the meantime become bankrupt, and the assignment in bankruptcy was held to carry the claim with it. In Williams v. HeardSearch
-
U. S. 529 , Comegys v. VasseSearch
-
in bankruptcy, and that payment of awards so made could not be regarded as a mere gratuity. In Emerson's Heirs v. HallSearch
-
Manifestly the claims involved in these cases do not come within the rule laid down in Comegys v. VasseSearch
-
and Heard v. WilliamsSearch
-
any opinion on their merits, the legislation seems to us plainly to place them within that applied in Emerson's Heirs v. HallSearch
-
provided that the awards should be made to the next of kin, instead of the assignees in bankruptcy. In Henry v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
notwithstanding many of the items of appropriation were in favor of administrators with the will annexed. In Buchanan v. UnitedSearch
-
as having that operation. In Milligan's case, as appears from the opinion of the Court of Claims in Durkee v. UnitedSearch
-
had ceased to operate. And this conclusion is in harmony with the legislation considered in Emerson's Heirs v. HallSearch
-
before there can be a certificate of that fact, it must appear that some next of kin are now in existence. Hooper v. UnitedSearch
-
Durkee v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 28 Ct.Cl. 326. This construction is sustained by the legislation of Congress referred to in Durkee v. UnitedSearch
-
This rule was followed in Swasey v. JaquesSearch
-
beyond that of the English courts supports the English view, and, on the whole, we are inclined to adopt it. Redmond v. BurroughsSearch
-
Davenport v. HasselSearch
-
Wright v. MethodistSearch
-
But the rule does not appear to have been approved in New York and New Hampshire. Tillman v. DavisSearch
-
Pinkham v. BlairSearch
-
Bowker v. BowkerSearch
-
Jackson v. JacksonSearch
-
Geery v. SkeldingSearch
-
Conklin v. DavisSearch
-
Conn. 377. As put by Rapallo, J., in Law v. HarmonySearch
-
as most in accord with the theory of the appropriations. The Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, Gardner v. ClarkeSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Blagge v. BalchSearch
-
Gray v. UnitedSearch
-
Buchanan v. UnitedSearch
-
In Comegys v. VasseSearch
-
In Williams v. HeardSearch
-
Comegys v. VasseSearch
-
In Emerson's Heirs v. HallSearch
-
Emerson's Heirs v. HallSearch
-
In Henry v. UnitedSearch
-
In Buchanan v. UnitedSearch
-
Hooper v. UnitedSearch
-
Swasey v. JaquesSearch
-
Redmond v. BurroughsSearch
-
New York and New Hampshire. Tillman v. DavisSearch
-
Law v. HarmonySearch
-
The Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, Gardner v. ClarkeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial