Citation network
Central Railroad and Banking Co. Vs. Wright
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 30, 1896
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. WrightSearch
-
U.S. 327 (1896) U.S. Supreme Court Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. WrightSearch
-
U.S. 327 (1896) Central Railroad & Banking Company v. WrightSearch
-
as distinguished from the property of the company. Thus, in Rome Railroad v. MayorSearch
-
of the company on deposit in the banks was intended to be distinguished from its other property. So also, in State v. HoodSearch
-
words, the exemption applies equally to the property of the corporation represented by its shares of stock. Gordon v. BaltimoreSearch
-
Baltimore v. BaltimoreSearch
-
State v. CumberlandSearch
-
Connersville v. BankSearch
-
New Haven v. CitySearch
-
Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. ShacklettSearch
-
Mo. 550. And in Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. GeorgiaSearch
-
in the case arises from a decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the case of Ordinary of Bibb County v. CentralSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
require a different construction. The distinction was clearly stated by Chief Justice Waite in Railroad Companies v. GainesSearch
-
was given to a similar provision of the charter of the Cairo & Fulton Railroad Company in Railroad Company v. LoftinSearch
-
U. S. 559 . So, in Bank v. TennesseeSearch
-
of the building as was required by the actual wants of the bank to carry on its business. See also Wiggins Ferry Co. v. EastSearch
-
St. Louis, 107 U. S. 365 , and Tennessee v. WhitworthSearch
-
the argument made here was the very one made in connection with the somewhat similar clause in Railroad Companies v. GainesSearch
-
county or municipal purposes by making no provision for the assessment and collection of such taxes. Houston County v. CentralSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. WrightSearch
-
Central Railroad & Banking Company v. WrightSearch
-
Rome Railroad v. MayorSearch
-
State v. HoodSearch
-
Gordon v. BaltimoreSearch
-
Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. GeorgiaSearch
-
of Ordinary of Bibb County v. CentralSearch
-
Bank v. TennesseeSearch
-
Wiggins Ferry Co. v. EastSearch
-
and Tennessee v. WhitworthSearch
-
Houston County v. CentralSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial