Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Gonzales Vs. Cunningham

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 21, 1896

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 8 linked 20 unlinked
Show
  1. Farnsworth Vs. Montana US Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1889
  2. United States Vs. Sanges US Supreme Court · Apr 04, 1892
  3. Perrine Vs. Slack US Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1896
  4. Benson Vs. Mcmahon US Supreme Court · May 14, 1888
  5. Stevens Vs. Fuller US Supreme Court · May 19, 1890
  6. Maish Vs. Arizona US Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1898
  7. Cross Vs. Burke US Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1892
  8. Shute Vs. Keyser US Supreme Court · May 15, 1893
  9. U.S. 612 (1896) U.S. Supreme Court Gonzales v. Cunningham
    Search
  10. U.S. 612 (1896) Gonzales v. Cunningham
    Search
  11. to be reviewed because so manifestly correct that the appeal must be regarded as taken for delay only. In Cross v. Burke
    Search
  12. of the District of Columbia in those cases, for the reasons given in In re Heath, 144 U. S. 92 , and Cross v. Burke
    Search
  13. the civil right of personal liberty, the matter in dispute had no money value, and an appeal would not lie. Cross v. Burke
    Search
  14. Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. District
    Search
  15. Chapman v. United
    Search
  16. The Supreme Court of New Mexico declined to allow an appeal in this case because of the rule laid down in Cross v. Burke
    Search
  17. Territory of Utah, and this notwithstanding the Act of March 3, 1885, c. 355, which was quoted and referred to in Snow v. United
    Search
  18. of New Mexico. This result is not affected by the Judiciary Act of March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 826, c. 517. Shute v. Keyser
    Search
  19. Folsom v. United
    Search
  20. Briceland v. Commonwealth
    Search
  21. Mechanics' Bank v. Withers
    Search
  22. Under these circumstances, the proceedings, in any view, cannot be held void for want of jurisdiction. McDowell v. United
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Gonzales v. Cunningham
    Search
  24. In Cross v. Burke
    Search
  25. and Cross v. Burke
    Search
  26. Snow v. United
    Search
  27. McDowell v. United
    Search
  28. United States v. Vigil
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial