Citation network
Bate Refrigerating Co. Vs. Sulzberger
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 04, 1895
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 1 (1895) U.S. Supreme Court Bate Refrigerating Co. v. SulzbergerSearch
-
U.S. 1 (1895) Bate Refrigerating Company v. SulzbergerSearch
-
a purpose to change the law by judicial action, based upon some supposed policy of Congress. United States v. BowenSearch
-
Stat. 318. In Pennock v. DialogueSearch
-
decision upon the question before this Court. That question was directly presented in Bate Refrigerating Co. v. GillettSearch
-
This decision was followed in Gramme Electrical Co. v. ArnouxSearch
-
which was granted before the time when the application for the United States patent was made. Bate Refrigerating Co. v. GillettSearch
-
expressed his mature judgment as to the scope and meaning of the act of 1870. The case of Bate Refrigerating Co. v. GillettSearch
-
the question now before it -- indeed, upon any question. Page 157 U. S. 33 In Edison Electric Light Co. v. U.SSearch
-
the sources of the revision to ascertain whether errors have or have not been committed by the revisers. United States v. BowenSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
above cases at the circuit, he remarked that the question should not be considered as an original one. In Bate Co. v. HammondSearch
-
F. 151, Judge Colt followed the decision in Bate Co. v. GillettSearch
-
And a like ruling was made by Judge Coxe in Accumulator Co. v. JulienSearch
-
In Andrews v. HoveySearch
-
U. S. 37 the law by judicial action based upon some supposed policy of Congress. But, as declared in Hadden v. CollectorSearch
-
Scott v. ReidSearch
-
to considerations of injustice or inconvenience that may arise from a particular construction of a statute. Wilson v. RousseauSearch
-
Nat. Blake v. BanksSearch
-
to accomplish results not contemplated by Congress. This Court, speaking by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. FisherSearch
-
under which the courts may look at prior laws for which a revision has been substituted are stated in United States v. BowenSearch
-
This principle was reaffirmed in Victor v. ArthurSearch
-
Cambria Iron Co. v. AshburnSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Bate Refrigerating Co. v. SulzbergerSearch
-
Bate Refrigerating Company v. SulzbergerSearch
-
of Congress. United States v. BowenSearch
-
In Pennock v. DialogueSearch
-
Bate Refrigerating Co. v. GillettSearch
-
Gramme Electrical Co. v. ArnouxSearch
-
of Bate Refrigerating Co. v. GillettSearch
-
In Edison Electric Light Co. v. U.SSearch
-
In Bate Co. v. HammondSearch
-
Bate Co. v. GillettSearch
-
Accumulator Co. v. JulienSearch
-
Hadden v. CollectorSearch
-
Wilson v. RousseauSearch
-
Victor v. ArthurSearch
-
United States v. FisherSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial