Citation network
Orchard Vs. Alexander
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 01, 1895
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 372 (1895) U.S. Supreme Court Orchard v. AlexanderSearch
-
U.S. 372 (1895) Orchard v. AlexanderSearch
-
In Lytle v. ArkansasSearch
-
forward into the Revised Statutes as section 453, and is still in force. Under this law, the case of Barnard's Heirs v. Ashley'sSearch
-
The case relied on, of Wilcox v. JacksonSearch
-
power of the general officers of the Land Department has been more than once presented to this Court. In Harkness v. UnderhillSearch
-
This question has several times been raised and decided in this Court, upholding the commissioner's powers. Garland v. WynnSearch
-
but it is pertinent as an affirmation of the commissioner's right of review of preemption entries. Cornelius v. KesselSearch
-
respect to such entries, though declaring that his power is not arbitrary and unlimited. In the recent case of Knight v. LandSearch
-
Bellows v. ToddSearch
-
Morton v. GreenSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Hestres v. BrennanSearch
-
Figg v. HensleySearch
-
Randall v. EdertSearch
-
Gray v. StocktonSearch
-
Judd v. RandallSearch
-
Darcy Page 157 U. S. 383 v. McCarthySearch
-
Gray v. McCanceSearch
-
McLane v. BoveeSearch
-
Vantongeren v. HeffermanSearch
-
practice, if uniform and long continued, is a matter worthy of consideration in determining its construction. Heath v. WallaceSearch
-
course this power of reviewing and setting aside the action of the local land officers is, as was decided in Cornelius v. KesselSearch
-
U. S. 456 , not arbitrary and unlimited. It does not prevent judicial inquiry. Johnson v. TowsleySearch
-
an interest of which he cannot be arbitrarily dispossessed. His interest is subject to state taxation. Carroll v. SoffordSearch
-
Some reliance is placed on the case of Butterworth v. HoeSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Orchard v. AlexanderSearch
-
of Barnard's Heirs v. Ashley'sSearch
-
of Wilcox v. JacksonSearch
-
Court. In Harkness v. UnderhillSearch
-
Cornelius v. KesselSearch
-
of Knight v. LandSearch
-
Johnson v. TowsleySearch
-
Carroll v. SoffordSearch
-
of Butterworth v. HoeSearch
-
Lytle v. ArkansasSearch
-
Aldrich v. AldrichSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial