Citation network
Dower Vs. Richards
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 04, 1894
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
- Distinguished
- Distinguished
- Relied / Followed
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 658 (1894) U.S. Supreme Court Dower v. RichardsSearch
-
U.S. 658 (1894) Dower v. RichardsSearch
-
for such purposes, does not defeat or impair the title of persons claiming under the town site patent. Deffeback v. HawkeSearch
-
Davis v. WeibboldSearch
-
always been distinguished from an appeal, which, unless expressly restricted, brings up both law and fact. Wiscart v. DauchySearch
-
Hyde v. BooraemSearch
-
and had therefore ordered the case to be reargued. United States v. KingSearch
-
How. 48 U. S. 865 . See also Parks v. TurnerSearch
-
Arthur v. HartSearch
-
Jeffries v. MutualSearch
-
the judgments or decrees at law or in equity of the highest court of a state has been by writ of error. Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
of the state court is against a right claimed under the Constitution and laws of the United States. Montgomery v. HernandezSearch
-
ground of law not involving any federal question, this Court has no jurisdiction. New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. LouisianaSearch
-
to the legal competency of evidence relied on to prove a title under an act of Congress. Again, in Almonester v. KentonSearch
-
had Page 151 U. S. 668 gone further and had given a construction to an act of Congress. So, in Moreland v. PageSearch
-
U. S. 20 How. 522, 61 U. S. 523 . In Lytle v. ArkansasSearch
-
the scope of the appellate jurisdiction of this Court is evident from the cases there cited. See also Maguire v. TylerSearch
-
of later decisions, some of them in cases very like the one now before us. Page 151 U. S. 669 In Lewis v. CampauSearch
-
reviewable, although, if the value of the land had been admitted, a federal question would have been presented. Hall v. JordonSearch
-
Wall. 393. In Boggs v. MiningSearch
-
U. S. 3 Wall. 304, 70 U. S. 310 . In Carpenter v. WilliamsSearch
-
U. S. 9 Wall. 785, 76 U. S. 786 . In Crary v. DevlinSearch
-
plaintiff because no such violation was proved, and this Court dismissed the writ of error upon the authority of Boggs v. MiningSearch
-
Lawyers C. P. Co's Rep. 510, 511. In Republican River Bridge Co. v. KansasSearch
-
And Boggs v. MiningSearch
-
Co. and Crary v. DevlinSearch
-
in admiralty cases, or in cases tried according to the law of Louisiana, need not now be considered. In Martin v. MarksSearch
-
U. S. 97 U.S. 345, 97 U. S. 348 . In Kenney v. EffingerSearch
-
U.S. 577. Page 151 U. S. 672 . In Quimby v. BoydSearch
-
U. S. 128 U.S. 488-489. In California Powder Works v. DavisSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Dower v. RichardsSearch
-
United States v. KingSearch
-
of the United States. Montgomery v. HernandezSearch
-
In Lytle v. ArkansasSearch
-
In Lewis v. CampauSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial