Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Dowell Vs. Applegate

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 05, 1894

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

44 entries 3 linked 41 unlinked
Show
  1. Russell Vs. Place US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1876
  2. Pennington Vs. Gibson US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1853
  3. Stevens Vs. Nichols US Supreme Court · Apr 01, 1889
  4. U.S. 327 (1894) U.S. Supreme Court Dowell v. Applegate
    Search
  5. U.S. 327 (1894) Dowell v. Applegate
    Search
  6. brought by Dowell was a bar to the present one. This decree was reversed by the Supreme Court of Oregon. Applegate v. Dowell
    Search
  7. appeal of Dowell, was affirmed upon the authority of the previous decision in the Supreme Court of Oregon. Applegate v. Dowell
    Search
  8. were all citizens of Oregon at the time that suit was brought or when it was removed from the state court. Stevens v. Nichols
    Search
  9. Crehore v. Ohio
    Search
  10. La Confiance v. Hall
    Search
  11. with the intent to evade such acts. We may so interpret the record because, in the opinion of Judge Deady in Dowell v. Applegate
    Search
  12. In Kempe's Lessee v. Kennedy
    Search
  13. In Skillern's Executors v. May's
    Search
  14. In Cameron v. McRoberts
    Search
  15. justice, so far as he was interested, could be done without affecting the other defendants. In McCormick v. Sullivant
    Search
  16. Similar views were expressed in Bank of United States v. Moss
    Search
  17. How. 31, 39, and Des Moines Nav. Co. v. Iowa
    Search
  18. States is that the court is without jurisdiction unless the contrary affirmatively appears from the record, Bors v. Preston
    Search
  19. of them, collaterally or otherwise than on writ of error or appeal to this Court. As said in Des Moines Nav. Co. v. Iowa
    Search
  20. from that presented in the suit in the federal court. In that view, our attention is called to the cases of Cromwell v. County
    Search
  21. U. S. 608 , and Bissell v. Spring
    Search
  22. the Court said in Cromwell v. County
    Search
  23. To the same effect were prior decisions of this Court. Hopkins v. Lee
    Search
  24. Smith v. Kernochan
    Search
  25. Parrish v. Ferris
    Search
  26. Black 606, 67 U. S. 609 . And the same doctrines were subsequently reaffirmed in Lumber Co. v. Buchtel
    Search
  27. U. S. 638 , 101 U. S. 639 , and Stout v. Lye
    Search
  28. U. S. 66 , 103 U. S. 71 , and at the present term, in Johnson Company v. Wharton
    Search
  29. Company, ante, 152 U. S. 252 . To these we may add the case of Stockton v. Ford
    Search
  30. U.S. Supreme Court Dowell v. Applegate
    Search
  31. the Supreme Court of Oregon. Applegate v. Dowell
    Search
  32. In McCormick v. Sullivant
    Search
  33. Bank of United States v. Moss
    Search
  34. and Des Moines Nav. Co. v. Iowa
    Search
  35. Bors v. Preston
    Search
  36. Des Moines Nav. Co. v. Iowa
    Search
  37. of Cromwell v. County
    Search
  38. and Bissell v. Spring
    Search
  39. Cromwell v. County
    Search
  40. Court. Hopkins v. Lee
    Search
  41. Lumber Co. v. Buchtel
    Search
  42. and Stout v. Lye
    Search
  43. Johnson Company v. Wharton
    Search
  44. of Stockton v. Ford
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial