Citation network
Brennan Vs. Titusville
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 30, 1894
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 289 (1894) U.S. Supreme Court Brennan v. TitusvilleSearch
-
U.S. 289 (1894) Brennan v. TitusvilleSearch
-
is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government, it cannot be sustained. Thus, in New Orleans Gas Co. v. LouisianaSearch
-
P. 92 U. S. 271 . Chy Lung v. FreemanSearch
-
U. S. 275 . And in Railroad Co. v. HusenSearch
-
In Walling v. MichiganSearch
-
In Leisy v. HardinSearch
-
introduces, so that they may become mingled with the common mass of property within the territory entered. Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
-
Brown v. MarylandSearch
-
And in the still later case of Crutcher v. KentuckySearch
-
So in the case of Minnesota v. BarberSearch
-
is a direct burden upon and obstruction to interstate commerce. Very similar to this was the case of Brimmer v. RebmanSearch
-
tax is a direct burden on interstate commerce is not open to question. In the early and leading case of Brown v. MarylandSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
In Welton v. MissouriSearch
-
In Leloup v. MobileSearch
-
interstate commerce have been frequently before this Court, and it may not be unwise to examine a few of them. Welton v. MissouriSearch
-
an adjudication that the imposition of a license tax on the peddling of goods is a regulation of commerce. Robbins v. ShelbySearch
-
go, it cannot go so far as to uphold any regulations directly affecting interstate commerce. In the case of Leloup v. MobileSearch
-
the state upon a telegraph company engaged in interstate commerce was declared beyond the powers of the state. Asher v. TexasSearch
-
inoperative so far as it affected one soliciting orders for a business house in another state, and the case of Robbins v. ShelbySearch
-
Taxing District was expressly reaffirmed. The same doctrine was applied in Stoutenburgh v. HennickSearch
-
taken out a license there, as required by an act of the Legislative Assembly of the District of Columbia. In Lyng v. MichiganSearch
-
In McCall v. CaliforniaSearch
-
In Crutcher v. KentuckySearch
-
was a direct burden on interstate commerce, and was therefore beyond the power of the state. The case of Ficklen v. ShelbySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Brennan v. TitusvilleSearch
-
New Orleans Gas Co. v. LouisianaSearch
-
Railroad Co. v. HusenSearch
-
of Crutcher v. KentuckySearch
-
of Minnesota v. BarberSearch
-
of Brimmer v. RebmanSearch
-
of Brown v. MarylandSearch
-
Welton v. MissouriSearch
-
Robbins v. ShelbySearch
-
of Leloup v. MobileSearch
-
Asher v. TexasSearch
-
of Robbins v. ShelbySearch
-
of the Legislative Assembly of the District of Columbia. In Lyng v. MichiganSearch
-
of Ficklen v. ShelbySearch
-
Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial