Citation network
Metcalf Vs. Watertown
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 14, 1894
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 671 (1894) U.S. Supreme Court Metcalf v. WatertownSearch
-
U.S. 671 (1894) Metcalf v. WatertownSearch
-
of a state, and as construed by its highest court, as rules of decision in the courts of the United States. Bauserman v. BluntSearch
-
U. S. 647 , 147 U. S. 652 , and cases cited. McElmoyle v. CohenSearch
-
Reference is also made to Ross v. DuvalSearch
-
or other country subject to the jurisdiction of the United States from which they are taken. In Dupasseur v. RochereauSearch
-
The same views were expressed by the Court through Mr. Justice Matthews in Embry v. PalmerSearch
-
Crescent City Livestock Co. v. Butchers'Search
-
in reference to judgments of any court of the United States other than in the State of Wisconsin. Massingill v. DownsSearch
-
In June, 1870, the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Wisconsin, in the case of Cole v. WeilSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of section sixteen, c. 138, Rev.Stat. 1858, and that the action thereon was barred by the lapse of ten years. Waterman v. WaterlooSearch
-
Wis. 260. In Ballin v. LoebSearch
-
after citing, to the point that United States courts are not foreign within the state where they are held, Turrell v. WarrenSearch
-
Wandling v. StrawSearch
-
Thomson v. LeeSearch
-
St. Albans v. BushSearch
-
Barney v. Patterson'sSearch
-
McCauley v. HargrovesSearch
-
Williams v. WilkesSearch
-
It seems to us that if the supreme court had arrived at this conclusion at the time Waterman v. WaterlooSearch
-
It is said in Harrington v. SmithSearch
-
accruing without the state, and the statute of 1878 was declaratory of a meaning which already existed. Koshkonong v. BurtonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Metcalf v. WatertownSearch
-
of the United States. Bauserman v. BluntSearch
-
In Dupasseur v. RochereauSearch
-
the State of Wisconsin. Massingill v. DownsSearch
-
of Cole v. WeilSearch
-
Waterman v. WaterlooSearch
-
In Ballin v. LoebSearch
-
Turrell v. WarrenSearch
-
Harrington v. SmithSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial