Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Luxton Vs. North River Bridge Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 14, 1894

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 1 linked 27 unlinked
Show
  1. Van BrocklIn Vs. Tennessee US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1886
  2. Luxton v. North
    Search
  3. River Bridge Co. - 153 U.S. 525 (1894) U.S. Supreme Court Luxton v. North
    Search
  4. River Bridge Co., 153 U.S. 525 (1894) Luxton v. North
    Search
  5. of the United States, or a railroad corporation for the purpose of promoting commerce among the states. McCulloch v. Maryland
    Search
  6. Osborn v. Bank
    Search
  7. California v. Pacific
    Search
  8. the Alleghenies to the Ohio, to authorize the construction of a public highway connecting several states. See Indiana v. United
    Search
  9. to the owners, Congress may do this with or without a concurrent act of the state in which the lands lie. Van Brocklin v. Tennessee
    Search
  10. Cherokee Nation v. Kansas
    Search
  11. United States v. Railroad
    Search
  12. The same learned justice repeated and enlarged upon that idea in his dissenting opinion in Pennsylvania v. Wheeling
    Search
  13. How. 59 U. S. 458 . A similar decision was made in The Clinton Bridge, 10 Wall. 454. See also Miller v. New
    Search
  14. of The Passaic Bridges, 3 Wall. Append. 782, decided by Mr. Justice Grier in the circuit court, and of Gilman v. Philadelphia
    Search
  15. Wall. 713, and Wright v. Nagle
    Search
  16. in regulating interstate commerce, to authorize the erection of bridges between two states. But in Stockton v. Baltimore
    Search
  17. land, is so clearly demonstrated as to render further discussion of the subject superfluous. In Willamette Bridge v. Hatch
    Search
  18. U.S. 125 U. S. 12 -13. In California v. Pacific
    Search
  19. U.S. Supreme Court Luxton v. North
    Search
  20. McCulloch v. Maryland
    Search
  21. See Indiana v. United
    Search
  22. Pennsylvania v. Wheeling
    Search
  23. Miller v. New
    Search
  24. and of Gilman v. Philadelphia
    Search
  25. and Wright v. Nagle
    Search
  26. Stockton v. Baltimore
    Search
  27. In Willamette Bridge v. Hatch
    Search
  28. In California v. Pacific
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial