Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Monroe Cattle Co. Vs. Becker

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 03, 1893

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

58 entries 6 linked 52 unlinked
Show
  1. Vigel Vs. Hopp US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1881
  2. Lindsey Vs. Hawes US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1862
  3. Bohall Vs. Dilla US Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1885
  4. Sturr Vs. Beck US Supreme Court · Mar 03, 1890
  5. Hughes Vs. Blake US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1821
  6. Cunningham Vs. Ashley US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1852
  7. U.S. 47 (1893) U.S. Supreme Court Monroe Cattle Co. v. Becker
    Search
  8. U.S. 47 (1893) Monroe Cattle Co. v. Becker
    Search
  9. regarded as not sustained, if, indeed, the answer be not sufficient for that purpose without other testimony. Hughes v. Blake
    Search
  10. Beals v. Illinois
    Search
  11. Salter v. Burt
    Search
  12. Hammond v. American
    Search
  13. of the person he represents, to keep the lands out of the market for an indefinite period. It is true that, in Martin v. Brown
    Search
  14. application was fictitious, since his whole case depends upon the propriety and legality of his action. In Martin v. Brown
    Search
  15. segregated from the public lands. This principle is established by a large number of cases in this Court. Wilcox v. Jackson
    Search
  16. Railroad v. United
    Search
  17. Kansas Pacific Railway v. Dunmeyer
    Search
  18. Hastings & Dakota Railroad v. Whitney
    Search
  19. Bardon v. Northern
    Search
  20. United States v. Southern
    Search
  21. be sustained, either under the decisions of this Court or that of the Supreme Court of Texas. In the case of Garland v. Wynn
    Search
  22. To the same effect are Cunningham v. Ashley
    Search
  23. Berthod v. McDonald
    Search
  24. Shepey v. Cowan
    Search
  25. U. S. 541 , 133 U. S. 55 . In the case of Stark v. Starrs
    Search
  26. And in Silver v. Ladd
    Search
  27. have such conveyance made in his name by a commissioner appointed by the court for that purpose. See also Johnson v. Towsley
    Search
  28. Wall. 72. It seems Page 147 U. S. 58 that this is also the law of Texas. Todd v. Fisher
    Search
  29. Mitchell v. Bass
    Search
  30. League v. Rogan
    Search
  31. Sherwood v. Fleming
    Search
  32. Wright v. Hawkins
    Search
  33. matured interest thereon. In any event, the defendant is in no position to claim a forfeiture on this ground. Canales v. Perez
    Search
  34. was included in one of those of November 25, and therefore, as to this section, the defendant has shown the better right. v. Defendant
    Search
  35. Becker. Initials are no legal part of a name, the authorities holding the full Christian name to be essential. Wilson v. Shannon
    Search
  36. Norris v. Graves
    Search
  37. Seely v. Boon
    Search
  38. Chappell v. Proctor
    Search
  39. Kinnersley v. Knott
    Search
  40. Turner v. Fitt
    Search
  41. Oakley v. Pegler
    Search
  42. Knox v. Starks
    Search
  43. Kenyon v. Semon
    Search
  44. Beggs v. Wellman
    Search
  45. Nash v. Collier
    Search
  46. Fewlass v. Abbott
    Search
  47. U.S. Supreme Court Monroe Cattle Co. v. Becker
    Search
  48. Martin v. Brown
    Search
  49. In Martin v. Brown
    Search
  50. Court. Wilcox v. Jackson
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial