Citation network
Bauserman Vs. Blunt
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 06, 1893
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 647 (1893) U.S. Supreme Court Bauserman v. BluntSearch
-
U.S. 647 (1893) Bauserman v. BluntSearch
-
when all the requisite facts appear on the face of the petition, may be taken advantage of by demurrer. Zane v. ZaneSearch
-
Bartlett v. BulleneSearch
-
Bank v. LowerySearch
-
the demurrer was rightly overruled is open on this writ of error, sued out after final judgment against him. Teal v. WalkerSearch
-
real and personal, as enacted by the legislature of a state, and as construed by its highest court. Higginson v. MeinSearch
-
Hendeson v. GriffinSearch
-
Green v. NealSearch
-
Harpending v. DutchSearch
-
Tioga Railroad v. BlossburgSearch
-
Moores v. NationalSearch
-
Penfield v. ChesapeakeSearch
-
U. S. 529 . In Patton v. EastonSearch
-
Wheat. 476, 14 U. S. 482 , and again in Powell v. HarmanSearch
-
Green v. NealSearch
-
reversed because of more recent decisions of the state court, establishing the opposite construction. In Pease v. PeckSearch
-
cannot be held by the courts of the United States, upon the same evidence, to be a law of the state. South Ottawa v. PerkinsSearch
-
U. S. 667 . See also Norton v. ShelbySearch
-
County, 118 U. S. 425 , 118 U. S. 440 . In Leffingwell v. WarrenSearch
-
In Levy v. StewartSearch
-
courts of Louisiana restricting such effect, because they were inconsistent with its own earlier decisions in Hanger v. AbbottSearch
-
and international law upon which this Court is never obliged to accept the opinion of the state courts. Huntington v. AttrillSearch
-
U. S. 657 , 146 U. S. 683 . In Tioga Railroad v. BlossburgSearch
-
In Amy v. DubuqueSearch
-
highest court of the state since the case was brought to this Court from the circuit court of the United States. Kibbe v. DittoSearch
-
Bank, 104 U. S. 625 . In Kibbe v. DittoSearch
-
in Emerson v. ClaytonSearch
-
But in Rose v. SandersonSearch
-
Ill. 247, and in Cole v. VanSearch
-
an estate by the curtesy vested in a husband at the time of its passage, and it was directly adjudged in Morrison v. NormanSearch
-
Ill. 477, and again distinctly asserted in Noble v. McFarlandSearch
-
until after his death. Such was the state of the law in Illinois when the circuit court of the United States, in Kibbe v. DittoSearch
-
was affirmed by this Court solely because of a subsequent decision of the Supreme Court of Illinois in Castner v. WalrodSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial