Citation network
United States Vs. Alexander
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 08, 1893
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 186 (1893) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. AlexanderSearch
-
U.S. 186 (1893) United States v. AlexanderSearch
-
United States in the Court of Claims under the provisions of the Act of July 15, 1882, 22 Stat. 168, c. 294. Acton v. BlundellSearch
-
said this Court, in the case of Pumpelly v. GreenSearch
-
This very point, arising under the act in question, was decided by this Court in Great Falls Manufacturing Co. v. AttorneySearch
-
law, any injury to which is redressable by law. To pollute or foul the water of a well is an actionable injury. Ball v. NyeSearch
-
features of this statute as coming within the suggestion of Chief Justice Gibson in the noted case of O'Connor v. PittsburghSearch
-
and the leading case of Acton v. BlundellSearch
-
Construing that statute in the case of Parker v. BostonSearch
-
In the quite recent case of Trowbridge v. BrooklineSearch
-
by the same court, similar in every respect to the act of Congress now under consideration. The case of Parker v. RailroadSearch
-
can be recovered for injuring land not taken, and Page 148 U. S. 1904 not abutting upon land taken. Dodge v. CountySearch
-
Parker v. BostonSearch
-
Marsden v. CambridgeSearch
-
to intend only damages which, but for the protection of the statute, could be recovered by action. See New River Co. v. JohnsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Metropolitan Board of Works v. McCarthySearch
-
The precise question presented here was decided, in regard to a railroad, in Parker v. BostonSearch
-
In Wheatley v. BaughSearch
-
Penn.St. 528, 533, the case of Parker v. BostonSearch
-
Maine Railroad is cited with approval. We also regard our own case of Great Falls Manufacturing Company v. AttorneySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. AlexanderSearch
-
Acton v. BlundellSearch
-
of Pumpelly v. GreenSearch
-
Great Falls Manufacturing Co. v. AttorneySearch
-
Ball v. NyeSearch
-
of O'Connor v. PittsburghSearch
-
of Acton v. BlundellSearch
-
of Parker v. BostonSearch
-
of Trowbridge v. BrooklineSearch
-
of Parker v. RailroadSearch
-
Dodge v. CountySearch
-
See New River Co. v. JohnsonSearch
-
of Great Falls Manufacturing Company v. AttorneySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial