Citation network
Cates Vs. Allen
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 10, 1893
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 451 (1893) U.S. Supreme Court Cates v. AllenSearch
-
U.S. 451 (1893) Cates v. AllenSearch
-
the United States, sitting as a court of equity, upon a bill to set aside and vacate a fraudulent conveyance. Scott v. NeelySearch
-
U. S. 106 , affirmed and applied. Holland v. ChallenSearch
-
U. S. 15 , and Whitehead v. ShattuckSearch
-
These sections were considered in Scott v. NeelySearch
-
action, although allowable in the Page 149 U. S. 457 state courts by virtue of state legislation, Bennett v. ButterworthSearch
-
Thompson v. RailroadSearch
-
as exhausting the legal remedy. This was well settled in Mississippi prior to the enactment in question. In Partee v. MathewsSearch
-
which acts as a lien on the property sought to be charged would be sufficient as the basis of a bill. In Fleming v. GraftonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
In Scott v. NeelySearch
-
debt, an interest in the property, or a lien thereon, created by contract or by some distinct legal proceeding. Smith v. RailroadSearch
-
Angell v. DraperSearch
-
Shirley v. WattsSearch
-
Wiggins v. ArmstrongSearch
-
McElwain v. WillisSearch
-
Crippen v. HudsonSearch
-
Jones v. GreenSearch
-
ground of equity interposition. This will be found to be true of the decisions in Page 149 U. S. 459 Holland v. ChallenSearch
-
cannot be regarded as the equivalent of the right of trial by jury secured by the Seventh Amendment. Whitehead v. ShattuckSearch
-
U. S. 347 . The result is that this decree must be reversed, as the case comes directly within Scott v. NeelySearch
-
not the case was properly removed, and this Court has jurisdiction to pass upon that determination. In Thompson v. RailroadSearch
-
Railway v. SwanSearch
-
So, also, in Davis v. GraySearch
-
In the case of Holland v. ChallenSearch
-
enforcement of a mechanic's lien, where proof of an existing debt is equally necessary to warrant a decree. In Stewart v. DunhamSearch
-
no question seems to have been made with regard to the jurisdiction in this particular. The same may be said of Dewey v. WestSearch
-
court by reason of the requisite citizenship's not really existing, or being collusively obtained, as in Hawes v. OaklandSearch
-
or where, upon an examination of the record, the requisite amount is found not to have been involved, as in Walter v. NortheasternSearch
-
s admitting its inability to do justice between the parties, and remanding the case upon that ground. In Thompson v. RailroadSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Cates v. AllenSearch
-
Scott v. NeelySearch
-
and Whitehead v. ShattuckSearch
-
In Partee v. MathewsSearch
-
In Fleming v. GraftonSearch
-
Smith v. RailroadSearch
-
the Seventh Amendment. Whitehead v. ShattuckSearch
-
In Thompson v. RailroadSearch
-
of Scott v. NeelySearch
-
Davis v. GraySearch
-
of Holland v. ChallenSearch
-
In Stewart v. DunhamSearch
-
of Dewey v. WestSearch
-
Walter v. NortheasternSearch
-
Bennett v. ButterworthSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial