Citation network
Moses Vs. Lawrence County Bank
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 10, 1893
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Moses v. LawrenceSearch
-
County Bank - 149 U.S. 298 (1893) U.S. Supreme Court Moses v. LawrenceSearch
-
County Bank, 149 U.S. 298 (1893) Moses v. LawrenceSearch
-
or acknowledging the receipt of one dollar, sufficiently express a consideration. Neal v. SmithSearch
-
Bolling v. MunchusSearch
-
imports a consideration. Mandeville v. WelchSearch
-
Page v. BankSearch
-
Townsend v. DerbySearch
-
And the endorsement of such a note is itself prima facie evidence of having been made for value. Riddle v. MandevilleSearch
-
upon its endorsement and delivery by the maker, the Sheffield Furnace Company, to Witherow, the first taker. Lea v. BankSearch
-
Little v. RogersSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Hooper v. WilliamsSearch
-
than the consideration which the note upon its face implies to have passed between the original parties. Leonard v. VredenburgSearch
-
Nelson v. BoyntonSearch
-
Bickford v. GibbsSearch
-
Nabb v. KoontzSearch
-
Parkhurst v. VailSearch
-
it is void where the statute of frauds, as in Alabama, requires the consideration to be expressed in writing. Leonard v. VredenburgSearch
-
Rigby v. MorwoodSearch
-
Mandeville v. RiddleSearch
-
Paine v. CentralSearch
-
U. S. 304 frauds under the general issue. That might have been true if he had pleaded the general issue. Kannady v. LambertSearch
-
Pollak v. BrushSearch
-
to filing a plea of the general issue, is too novel to be accepted without proof, and seems inconsistent with Grigg v. GilmerSearch
-
If the record did not show what the pleadings were, it might be presumed that the general issue was pleaded. May v. SharpeSearch
-
Hatchett v. MoltonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Moses v. LawrenceSearch
-
Neal v. SmithSearch
-
Riddle v. MandevilleSearch
-
Lea v. BankSearch
-
Leonard v. VredenburgSearch
-
Kannady v. LambertSearch
-
Grigg v. GilmerSearch
-
May v. SharpeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial