Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Counselman Vs. Hitchcock

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 11, 1892

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

54 entries 54 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 547 (1892) U.S. Supreme Court Counselman v. Hitchcock
    Search
  2. U.S. 547 (1892) Counselman v. Hitchcock
    Search
  3. to give testimony which may tend to show that he himself has committed a crime. The ruling in People v. Kelly
    Search
  4. jury. We cannot yield our assent to the view taken on this subject by the Court of Appeals of New York in People v. Kelly
    Search
  5. which will tend to criminate him or Page 142 U. S. 564 subject him to fines, penalties, or forfeitures. Rex v. Slaney
    Search
  6. Cates v. Hardacre
    Search
  7. Maloney v. Bartley
    Search
  8. Southard v. Rexford
    Search
  9. People v. Mather
    Search
  10. Lister v. Boker
    Search
  11. with the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act, entitled him to invoke the protection of the Constitution. State v. Nowell
    Search
  12. in absolute bar of such prosecution. A review of the subject in adjudged cases will be useful. In Commonwealth v. Gibbs
    Search
  13. cases where the answer might involve him in shame or reproach, and it held to the same effect in Lessee of Galbreath v. Eichelberger
    Search
  14. In 1853, in State v. Quarles
    Search
  15. to compel them to testify as to all matters embraced by the provisions of the statute on that subject. In Higdon v. Heard
    Search
  16. protection which was contemplated by the Constitution, and therefore he was bound to answer. In 1860, in Wilkins v. Malone
    Search
  17. his answer could be given in evidence against him in a subsequent criminal prosecution. The court referred to State v. Quarles
    Search
  18. supra, and Higdon v. Heard
    Search
  19. circumstances which might lead to a criminal prosecution. In 1861, in the Court of Appeals of New York People v. Kelly
    Search
  20. The opinion then cites the case of People v. Kelly
    Search
  21. and also People v. Mather
    Search
  22. The opinion then refers to the case of People v. Kelly
    Search
  23. In Cullen v. Commonwealth
    Search
  24. The opinion then cited People v. Kelly
    Search
  25. deprive the witness of his privilege without indemnity. The judgment of the Hustings Court was reversed. In State v. Nowell
    Search
  26. and that, unless he should testify, the motion for the attachment must be granted. In 1880, in La Fontaine v. Southern
    Search
  27. would be maintained intact and full. In Temple v. Commonwealth
    Search
  28. of Article 1 of the bill of rights of the Constitution of Virginia of 1870 that was considered in Cullen v. Commonwealth
    Search
  29. was not within the statute against unlawful gaming. The judgment of the Hustings Court was reversed. In Boyd v. United
    Search
  30. was to compel the party on whom the order of the court was served to be a witness against himself. In People v. Sharp
    Search
  31. the party against the consequences of his previous testimony. The court cited with approval the case of People v. Kelly
    Search
  32. supra. In Bedgood v. State
    Search
  33. respect, we give our assent rather to the doctrine of Emery's Case, in Massachusetts, than to that of People v. Kelly
    Search
  34. and we consider that the ruling of this court in Boyd v. United
    Search
  35. U.S. Supreme Court Counselman v. Hitchcock
    Search
  36. People v. Kelly
    Search
  37. Rex v. Slaney
    Search
  38. of the Constitution. State v. Nowell
    Search
  39. In Commonwealth v. Gibbs
    Search
  40. Lessee of Galbreath v. Eichelberger
    Search
  41. State v. Quarles
    Search
  42. In Higdon v. Heard
    Search
  43. Wilkins v. Malone
    Search
  44. and Higdon v. Heard
    Search
  45. the Court of Appeals of New York People v. Kelly
    Search
  46. of People v. Kelly
    Search
  47. In State v. Nowell
    Search
  48. La Fontaine v. Southern
    Search
  49. In Temple v. Commonwealth
    Search
  50. Cullen v. Commonwealth
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial