Citation network
United States Vs. Texas
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 29, 1892
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 621 (1892) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. TexasSearch
-
U.S. 621 (1892) United States v. TexasSearch
-
is political in its nature and character, and not susceptible of judicial determination, the defendant cites Foster v. NeilsonSearch
-
Pet. 691, 31 U. S. 711 , and Garcia v. LeeSearch
-
Pet. 511, 37 U. S. 517 . In Foster v. NeilsonSearch
-
In United States v. ArredondoSearch
-
the Court, referring to Foster v. NeilsonSearch
-
The same principles were recognized in Cherokee Nation v. GeorgiaSearch
-
and Garcia v. LeeSearch
-
Article 9. At the time of the adoption of the Constitution, there existed, as this Court said in Rhode Island v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the Constitution, such judicial power extends is no longer an open question in this Court. The cases of Rhode Island v. MassachusettsSearch
-
New Jersey v. NewSearch
-
Florida v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Alabama v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Virginia v. WestSearch
-
Missouri v. KentuckySearch
-
U. S. 479 , and Nebraska v. IowaSearch
-
original suits in this Court for the judicial determination of disputed boundary lines between states. In New Jersey v. NewSearch
-
And in Virginia v. WestSearch
-
So, in Wisconsin v. PelicanSearch
-
This question is, in effect, answered by United States v. NorthSearch
-
and in the other, on the character of the parties, whatever may be the subject of controversy. Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
because the judicial power of the United States does not extend to suits of individuals against states. Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
must be conceded that a state can bring an original suit in this Court against a citizen of another state. Wisconsin v. PelicanSearch
-
of like character between the United States and a state. Mr. Justice Bradley, speaking for the Court in Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
between states as to boundary lines, and other questions admitting of judicial solution. And yet the case of Penn v. LordSearch
-
rights. This is not a new question in this Court. It was suggested in argument, though not decided, in Fowler v. LindseySearch
-
But the question arose directly in Rhode Island v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Pet. 39 U. S. 210 , 39 U. S. 256 . The above cases ( New Jersey v. NewSearch
-
York, Missouri v. IowaSearch
-
Virginia, Missouri v. KentuckySearch
-
and Nebraska v. IowaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. TexasSearch
-
Foster v. NeilsonSearch
-
In Foster v. NeilsonSearch
-
of Rhode Island v. MassachusettsSearch
-
In New Jersey v. NewSearch
-
Wisconsin v. PelicanSearch
-
Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
of Penn v. LordSearch
-
United States v. ArredondoSearch
-
Missouri v. IowaSearch
-
Indiana v. KentuckySearch
-
Rhode Island v. MassachusettsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial