Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Budd Vs. New York

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 29, 1892

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

65 entries 65 unlinked
Show
  1. Budd v. New
    Search
  2. York - 143 U.S. 517 (1892) U.S. Supreme Court Budd v. New
    Search
  3. York, 143 U.S. 517 (1892) Budd v. New
    Search
  4. with a public interest, and did not violate the Constitution of the United States, and was valid. The case of Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  5. Railway Co. v. Minnesota
    Search
  6. giving a dissenting opinion, and Judge Peckham adhering to the dissenting opinion which he gave in the case of People v. Walsh
    Search
  7. of the Court. The main question involved in these cases is whether this Court will adhere to its decision in Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  8. U. S. 113 . The Court of Appeals of New York, in People v. Budd
    Search
  9. and were engaged in that business, and it answered the inquiry in the affirmative. It also reviewed the case of Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  10. was similar to, and not distinguishable in principle from, the act of the State of New York. In regard to Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  11. Bertholf v. O'Reilly
    Search
  12. B.E.S. R. Co. V. B.S
    Search
  13. R. Co., 111 N.Y. 132, and People v. King
    Search
  14. N.Y. 418, as cases in which Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  15. had been referred to by it, and said that it could not overrule and disregard Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  16. without subverting the principle of its own decision in People v. King
    Search
  17. and certainly not without disregarding many of its deliberate expressions in approval of the principle of Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  18. case and justifying legislative regulation. The opinion further said that the criticism to which the case of Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  19. of Appeals of New York, so far as they support the validity of the statute in question, as sound and just. In Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  20. of conviction against them on the ground that the statute of Illinois was a valid and constitutional enactment, Munn v. People
    Search
  21. of the United States, and to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of that Constitution. This Court, in Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  22. This Court further held in Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  23. U. S. 747 , Mr. Justice Bradley, who was one of the Justices who concurred in the opinion of the court in Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  24. in Sinking Fund Cases, it shows what Mr. Justice Bradley regarded as the principle of the decision in Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  25. In Spring Valley Waterworks v. Schottler
    Search
  26. monopoly of the sale, we do not doubt. That question is settled by what was decided on full consideration in Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  27. Railway Co. v. Illinois
    Search
  28. U. S. 557 , 118 U. S. 569 , Mr. Justice Miller, who had concurred in the judgment in Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  29. In Dow v. Beidelman
    Search
  30. U. S. 686 , it was said by MR. JUSTICE GRAY, in delivering the opinion of the Court, that in Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  31. JUSTICE GRAY and MR. JUSTICE LAMAR concurred, that the decision of the Court in that case practically overruled Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  32. but the opinion of the Court did not say so, nor did it refer to Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  33. distinguishable from the present cases. It is thus apparent that this Court has adhered to the decision in Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  34. and those doctrines have since been repeatedly enforced in the decisions of the courts of the states. In Railway v. Railway
    Search
  35. Ohio St. 604, 616, in 1877, it was said, citing Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  36. That was a decision by the Supreme Court Commission of Ohio. In State v. Gas
    Search
  37. Company, 34 Ohio St. 572, 582, in 1878, Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  38. to be controlled by the public for the common good so long as he maintains the use, and the court added that in Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  39. with franchises to be exercised to subserve the public interest. The Supreme Court of Illinois, in Ruggles v. People
    Search
  40. Ill. 256, 262, in 1878, cited Munn v. People
    Search
  41. Ill. 80, which was affirmed in Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  42. exercising the business of storing and handling grain for individuals. The Supreme Court of Alabama, in Davis v. State
    Search
  43. was a mere police Page 143 U. S. 540 regulation, to which there was no constitutional objection, citing Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  44. profits of agricultural pursuits, to the public detriment at least within the specified territory. In Baker v. State
    Search
  45. Wis. 368, 373, in 1882, Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  46. in conflict with any provisions of the federal Constitution. The Court of Appeals of Kentucky, in 1882, in Nash v. Page
    Search
  47. Ky. 539, 545, cited Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  48. monopoly of the sales of tobacco at auction. In 1884, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, in Girard Storage Co. v. Southwark
    Search
  49. Co., 105 Penn.St. 248, 252, cited Munn v. Illinois
    Search
  50. U.S. Supreme Court Budd v. New
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial